Difference between revisions of "Talk:30: Donner"
m |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well. [[User:Torappu|Torappu]] ([[User talk:Torappu|talk]]) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well. [[User:Torappu|Torappu]] ([[User talk:Torappu|talk]]) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I disagree with the original interpretation. The party of three was, I believe, more likely concerned by an additional, undepicted party, also waiting to eat at the establishment, and possibly fearing for their own safety from said cannibalism.--[[User:StrangerDanger|StrangerDanger]] ([[User talk:StrangerDanger|talk]]) 20:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:46, 27 June 2013
The indication is that they were waiting a long time for the table and decided to eat one of their companions. -- 64.85.162.210 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well. Torappu (talk) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
I disagree with the original interpretation. The party of three was, I believe, more likely concerned by an additional, undepicted party, also waiting to eat at the establishment, and possibly fearing for their own safety from said cannibalism.--StrangerDanger (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)