Difference between revisions of "Talk:157: Filler Art"
m |
STEMenjoyer (talk | contribs) m (comment) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Seems good to me too.[[User:BruceJohnJennerLawso|BruceJohnJennerLawso]] ([[User talk:BruceJohnJennerLawso|talk]]) 02:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | Seems good to me too.[[User:BruceJohnJennerLawso|BruceJohnJennerLawso]] ([[User talk:BruceJohnJennerLawso|talk]]) 02:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I thought the joke was about how the one-dimensionality of stick figures' limbs means thigh rotations have no apparent effect. Anyone else? [[User:STEMenjoyer|STEMenjoyer]] ([[User talk:STEMenjoyer|talk]]) 19:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:43, 14 May 2025
What IS thigh rotation? Is this a thing or just another joke on thighs? 35.13.221.137 18:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)NariOX
- It's just a joke. You can't get your thighs rotated (a parody of getting the tires of your car rotated), at least not in the United States. Smperron (talk)
- Given the general topic, and xkcd's penchant for math, "phi" is sometimes used to describe rotation, I believe. I think it is around the vertical axis, at least in some 3D modeling software. It is a stretch, but thigh and phi sound similar. Tryc (talk) 14:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I can't tell what's incomplete about the explanation. Someone explain? 108.162.216.45 20:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Seems good to me too.BruceJohnJennerLawso (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I thought the joke was about how the one-dimensionality of stick figures' limbs means thigh rotations have no apparent effect. Anyone else? STEMenjoyer (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
