Difference between revisions of "User:While False"
m (X K C D moved page User:WhiIe FaIse to User:While False) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This user impersonates me. [[User: | + | This user impersonates me. [[User:WhiIe FaIse|WhiIe FaIse]] ([[User talk:While FaIse|talk]]) 12:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC) |
− | Note the | + | Note the L's instead of L's in the username. This user is "whiLe faLse." {{unsigned ip|172.70.130.121}} |
− | :Exactly. And removes my comments. Hardly a coincidence in good faith. [[User: | + | :Exactly. And removes my comments. Hardly a coincidence in good faith. [[User:WhiIe False|WhiIe False]] ([[User talk:While False|talk]]) 15:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC) |
::I had wondered, though in the font I get in this page's title (serifed capital-"I"s) it became clear. | ::I had wondered, though in the font I get in this page's title (serifed capital-"I"s) it became clear. | ||
::And clearing a lot of (deadish) past reports might have been something good. It had become a rather long littany of old conversations (as with other Admin pages), but really should have been carefully archived to a sub-page, with care, not the whole thing. But I suppose I fell for it, at first glance, and accepted it as not actually a bad edit. | ::And clearing a lot of (deadish) past reports might have been something good. It had become a rather long littany of old conversations (as with other Admin pages), but really should have been carefully archived to a sub-page, with care, not the whole thing. But I suppose I fell for it, at first glance, and accepted it as not actually a bad edit. |
Revision as of 17:26, 2 May 2022
This user impersonates me. WhiIe FaIse (talk) 12:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Note the L's instead of L's in the username. This user is "whiLe faLse." 172.70.130.121 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Exactly. And removes my comments. Hardly a coincidence in good faith. WhiIe False (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- I had wondered, though in the font I get in this page's title (serifed capital-"I"s) it became clear.
- And clearing a lot of (deadish) past reports might have been something good. It had become a rather long littany of old conversations (as with other Admin pages), but really should have been carefully archived to a sub-page, with care, not the whole thing. But I suppose I fell for it, at first glance, and accepted it as not actually a bad edit.
- Which, given all the other turbulance being caused (many, but not all, of the things I Undid just had "Nope" as the reason for the devandalising edit - but don't trust future ones that say "Nope" to be from liddle-old anonymous me, now that I've said that, too easy to copy) was actually quite refreshing. Unnecessary, but failed to trigger any annoyance.
- And now I'll know to have a very good glance at 'known' usernames. It's a mostly spent trick, being so prominent, but the moron involved may have the lack of imagination to move on again. So if it happens again I'll not be fooled.
- In the meantime, fight the good fight, brethren, sistren and othren! It's probably the best way forward. 172.70.162.77 15:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)