Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Dynamic comics"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(I don't like it.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
 
To me "Dynamic" is too flowery and abstract. I don't like this as a category, having out-of-the-ordinary, Interactive, and Large Comics categories is both more specific, and more helpful for finding like comics. Calling them Dynamic(!) sounds like a marketing term.
 
To me "Dynamic" is too flowery and abstract. I don't like this as a category, having out-of-the-ordinary, Interactive, and Large Comics categories is both more specific, and more helpful for finding like comics. Calling them Dynamic(!) sounds like a marketing term.
  

Revision as of 11:42, 30 November 2024

To me "Dynamic" is too flowery and abstract. I don't like this as a category, having out-of-the-ordinary, Interactive, and Large Comics categories is both more specific, and more helpful for finding like comics. Calling them Dynamic(!) sounds like a marketing term.

Now, if Randall ever comes up with a purely non-deterministic comic (something that randomly generates content for each pageview/ip address/time-of-day/geo-location/position-about-the-sun/lunar-phase I'd consider that Dynamic. However, none of the comics currently in existence are that. Umwelt comes the closest, but each one was still hand-drawn, and not absolutely non-deterministic.

-- lcarsos (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)