Talk:3055: Giants

Anyone know why "the Man in the Moon" has square brackets around it? Stylistic choice, or clever reference? 172.71.254.43 19:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

I suspect it's to make it clear that it's all one block of text, otherwise it might be read as separate objects on each line. IntangibleMatter (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

I thought that too but then Jolly Green should be in brackets as well. I think it's because Man in the Moon doesn't have "giant" after it. The rest all assume "giant" after (gas giant, etc.).162.158.63.81 20:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)Pat

I think that the difference between these two cases is just a matter of available space. The space around "Jolly/Green" makes it clear that the two words go together, whereas "The/Man in/the Moon" would be crammed together even if the three lines were supposed to be distinct, unless the font was a lot smaller. The brackets remove that ambiguity. BunsenH (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Given how commonly this community makes up answers, and how very little information there is on this, I suspect the correct answer to this question to not emerge here, but maybe somebody can make an argument that is actually convincing. It's certainly notably different and I didn't think much of it until seeing it mentioned. 162.158.63.28 20:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

I think it's because unlike all the other entries in the diagram, it is not appropriate to append the word "Giant" to the end of it. Like, it's the full name of a particular giant, rather than a "type" of one as otherwise implied by the title of the chart. 172.69.7.194 22:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Alas, if only the Norse had referred to Ymir and his descendants as "Ice Giants" instead of "Frost Giants", we might have had another contender for that central space. MeZimm (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Been a while since Randall's enthusiasm for Buns (rabbits) made an appearance in the comic! 172.70.130.216 05:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Classifying the Atacama Giant and Cardiff Giant as 'Geological / Planetary' seems pretty dubious - requires an unusually broad interpretation of one or other of those terms.172.70.163.109 09:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)