Difference between revisions of "Talk:3056: RNA"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
1960s: central dogma of molecular biology; 1980s: discovery of catalytic self-splicing RNA; 2000s: genomic sequencing and discovery of diverse array of non-coding RNAs; 2040s: extrapolation of RNA hypothesis, with aside to notion that life have arisen multiple times (earlier instances extinguished by large impacts) | 1960s: central dogma of molecular biology; 1980s: discovery of catalytic self-splicing RNA; 2000s: genomic sequencing and discovery of diverse array of non-coding RNAs; 2040s: extrapolation of RNA hypothesis, with aside to notion that life have arisen multiple times (earlier instances extinguished by large impacts) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should the transcript point out the changes in the poster in each frame? Maybe in the later frames those are RNA rather than DNA. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 15:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 26 February 2025
I really hate that feeling when you need an explanation for at least a couple frames but you're too early to read it and too dumb to write it. 172.68.3.27 14:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
The 2040's guess in the title text is wild, and would be SO cool if we were able to discover that in 20 years.
oh God ⯅A dream demon⯅ (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
1960s: central dogma of molecular biology; 1980s: discovery of catalytic self-splicing RNA; 2000s: genomic sequencing and discovery of diverse array of non-coding RNAs; 2040s: extrapolation of RNA hypothesis, with aside to notion that life have arisen multiple times (earlier instances extinguished by large impacts)
Should the transcript point out the changes in the poster in each frame? Maybe in the later frames those are RNA rather than DNA. Barmar (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
