Difference between revisions of "Talk:3060: Omniroll"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Add comment)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
Aaaand "Omniroll" has already been added to the Wikipedia list. Good job, everyone! [[Special:Contributions/104.23.190.119|104.23.190.119]] 17:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
 
Aaaand "Omniroll" has already been added to the Wikipedia list. Good job, everyone! [[Special:Contributions/104.23.190.119|104.23.190.119]] 17:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
 
: Oh dang, it's already been taken down. Sadge. [[Special:Contributions/104.23.187.173|104.23.187.173]] 17:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
 
: Oh dang, it's already been taken down. Sadge. [[Special:Contributions/104.23.187.173|104.23.187.173]] 17:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
 +
:: The removal was tagged "The omniroll is not a real food, just an xkcd joke". Not with that attitude it isn't! I give us two days, and if no-one has done one in a week then I'll do it. [[User:SqueakSquawk4|SqueakSquawk4]] ([[User talk:SqueakSquawk4|talk]]) 21:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  
 
MIght be worth a <nowiki>[[Category:Omni]]</nowiki>, or similar. [[2653: Omnitaur]] and [[2738: Omniknot]], at least, then this. Maybe other ones might be recalled, but not right now by me. (An actual vague search seems to have the search-site really want to bring to note {{what if|12}}, as using "omnidirectional", but doesn't really count for at least three reasons.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.58.5|172.70.58.5]] 17:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
 
MIght be worth a <nowiki>[[Category:Omni]]</nowiki>, or similar. [[2653: Omnitaur]] and [[2738: Omniknot]], at least, then this. Maybe other ones might be recalled, but not right now by me. (An actual vague search seems to have the search-site really want to bring to note {{what if|12}}, as using "omnidirectional", but doesn't really count for at least three reasons.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.58.5|172.70.58.5]] 17:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:02, 8 March 2025

I wonder what the filling would be... 172.69.20.143 02:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

At some point, this explanation will be complete. Then we can say "that's a wrap!"... 172.69.79.190 02:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

The real fun would come if this became popular enough to gain its own Wikipedia page. --162.158.33.252 03:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

People keep vandalizing it to add "Uranium Roll" and make the whole thing inedible. Not like it was getting eaten before, but still. 172.71.159.66 03:20, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

This is reminiscent of the 2005 SNL skit Taco Town. "A crunchy all beef taco smothered in nacho cheese, lettuce, tomato, and special Southwestern sauce; wrapped in a soft flour tortilla with a layer of re-fried beans in between; wrapped in a savory corn tortilla with a middle layer of Monterrey jack cheese; wrapped in a deep fried gordita shell smeared with a layer of special 'guacomolito' sauce; wrapped in a corn husk filled with pico de gallo; wrapped in an authentic Parisian crepe filled with egg, gruyere, sausage and portobello mushrooms; wrapped in a Chicago-style, deep-dish, meat lover's pizza; rolled up in a blueberry pancake; dipped in batter and deep fried until it's golden brown; and served in a commemorative tote bag filled with spicy vegetarian chili." 172.68.210.176 03:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

I was thinking more along the lines of the everything bagel in Everything Everywhere All at Once. TomtheBuilder (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

I'd instead sell "Fruit by the Foot" by the meter to get to a synthesis. 172.70.174.78 09:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC) What would happen if omniroll were added to that Wikipedia page? Would we have a "set of all sets that contain themself" nonsense? 162.158.155.49 14:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Aaaand "Omniroll" has already been added to the Wikipedia list. Good job, everyone! 104.23.190.119 17:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Oh dang, it's already been taken down. Sadge. 104.23.187.173 17:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
The removal was tagged "The omniroll is not a real food, just an xkcd joke". Not with that attitude it isn't! I give us two days, and if no-one has done one in a week then I'll do it. SqueakSquawk4 (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

MIght be worth a [[Category:Omni]], or similar. 2653: Omnitaur and 2738: Omniknot, at least, then this. Maybe other ones might be recalled, but not right now by me. (An actual vague search seems to have the search-site really want to bring to note what if? 12, as using "omnidirectional", but doesn't really count for at least three reasons.) 172.70.58.5 17:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)