User talk:Utdtutyabthsc

DO NOT USE AI

Hi, and welcome. Please don't use AI in your contributions as they are often incorrect. I will go though all your contributions and fix them, but please refrain for using AI in the future, or you may end up being blocked. Thanks! FaviFake (talk) 11:24, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

OH - very sorry! i'll try to use normal ones from now on! --Utdtutyabthsc (talk) 20:24, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Normal ones? FaviFake (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

i mean normal edits. sorry, haven't checked this place in a while. --Utdtutyabthsc (talk) 06:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Incomplete

Regarding this, they often don't give a reason, because the template is there from page creation (historically to encourage it being filled in), when everything needs doing to it (that isn't there automatically) and the BOT doesn't know what to suggest (nor should it). ... As to why they hang around, it just takes someone (like yourself) to see that it no longer needs fiddling about with any more. (Though it's very possible that the person who removes the Incomplete tag essentially 'bumps' it in the attention of someone else who now realises that it needs a whole lot more editing... It happens!) As long as it's not under a week old (or not had some recent tweaking going on, that one was last edited 27/Jan, which suggests it hadn't), feel free to just remove the tag. No need to be surprised that it's still there, it just means that nobody else has noticed it (and thought it time to be removed) before you. Of course, be a bit more cautious is if it's still rather 'active', although the Incomplete tag, these days, isn't really the "quick, it needs an edit!" thing as much as a friendly marker that anyone who checks every week or so can enjoy (because there's usually a nice inside-joke embedded in it). 81.179.199.253 21:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

So, the incomplete tags in something older than a week usually mean either a. it really is incomplete or b. no-one's bothered to check them, or c. they haven't been checked for quite a bit and recently they realised they needed a lot more editing? got it, thanks for the helpful info! i'll try to keep this in mind later on. (sorry for the late reply, the message was sent at 1 am where i live...) --Utdtutyabthsc (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2026 (UTC)