Editing 1047: Approximations

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 26: Line 26:
 
===Equations===
 
===Equations===
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
{| class=" wiki table"
 
|-
 
|-
 
!align="center"|Thing to be approximated:
 
!align="center"|Thing to be approximated:
Line 57: Line 57:
 
|align="center"|31,557,600 (Julian calendar), 31,556,952 (Gregorian calendar)
 
|align="center"|31,557,600 (Julian calendar), 31,556,952 (Gregorian calendar)
 
|align="left"|After this comic was released [[Randall]] got many responses by viewers. So he did add this statement to the top of the comic page:
 
|align="left"|After this comic was released [[Randall]] got many responses by viewers. So he did add this statement to the top of the comic page:
"Lots of emails mention the physicist favorite, 1 year = pi × 10<sup>7</sup> seconds. 75<sup>4</sup> is a hair more accurate, but it's hard to top 3,141,592's elegance." π × 10<sup>7</sup> is nearly equal to 31,415,926.536, and 75<sup>4</sup> is exactly 31,640,625. Randall's elegance belongs to the number π, but it should be multiplied by the factor of ten.
+
"Lots of emails mention the physicist favourite, 1 year = pi × 10<sup>7</sup> seconds. 75<sup>4</sup> is a hair more accurate, but it's hard to top 3,141,592's elegance." π × 10<sup>7</sup> is nearly equal to 31,415,926.536, and 75<sup>4</sup> is exactly 31,640,625. Randall's elegance belongs to the number π, but it should be multiplied by the factor of ten.
  
Using the traditional definitions that a second is 1/60 of a minute, a minute is 1/60 of an hour, and an hour is 1/24 of a day, a 365-day common year is exactly 31,536,000 seconds (the "''Rent'' method" approximation) and the 366-day leap year is 31,622,400 seconds. Until the calendar was reformed by Pope Gregory, there was one leap year in every four years, making the average year 365.25 days, or 31,557,600 seconds. On the current calendar system, there are only 97 leap years in every 400 years, making the average year 365.2425 days, or 31,556,952 seconds. In technical usage, a "second" is now defined based on physical constants, even though the length of a day varies inversely with the changing angular velocity of the earth.  To keep the official time synchronized with the rotation of the earth, a "leap second" is occasionally added, resulting in a slightly longer year.
+
Using the traditional definitions that a second is 1/60 of a minute, a minute is 1/60 of an hour, and an hour is 1/24 of a day, a 365-day common year is exactly 31,536,000 seconds (the "''Rent'' method" approximation) and the 366-day leap year is 31,622,400 seconds. Until the calendar was reformed by Pope Gregory, there was one leap year every four years, making the average year 365.25 days, or 31,557,600 seconds. On the current calendar system, there are only 97 leap years in every 400 years, making the average year 365.2425 days, or 31,556,952 seconds. In technical usage, a "second" is now defined based on physical constants, even though the length of a day varies inversely with the changing angular velocity of the earth.  To keep the official time synchronized with the rotation of the earth, a "leap second" is occasionally added, resulting in a slightly longer year.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|Seconds in a year (''Rent'' method)
 
|align="center"|Seconds in a year (''Rent'' method)
Line 65: Line 65:
 
|align="center"|31,536,000
 
|align="center"|31,536,000
 
|align="center"|31,557,600 (Julian calendar), 31,556,952 (Gregorian calendar)
 
|align="center"|31,557,600 (Julian calendar), 31,556,952 (Gregorian calendar)
|align="left"|"''Rent'' Method" refers to the song "{{w|Seasons of Love}}" from the musical ''{{w|Rent (musical)|Rent}}''. The song asks, "How do you measure a year?" One line says "525,600 minutes" while most of the rest of the song suggests the best way to measure a year is moments shared with a loved one. This method for remembering how many seconds are in a year was also referenced in [https://what-if.xkcd.com/23/ What If? 23].
+
|align="left"|"''Rent'' Method" refers to the song "{{w|Seasons of Love}}" from the musical ''{{w|Rent (musical)|Rent}}''. The song asks, "How do you measure a year?" One line says "525,600 minutes" while most of the rest of the song suggests the best way to measure a year is moments shared with a loved one.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|Age of the universe (seconds)
 
|align="center"|Age of the universe (seconds)
Line 83: Line 83:
 
|align="center"|0.00<span style="text-decoration: overline;">714285</span>
 
|align="center"|0.00<span style="text-decoration: overline;">714285</span>
 
|align="center"|0.0072973525664 (accepted value as of 2014), close to 1/137
 
|align="center"|0.0072973525664 (accepted value as of 2014), close to 1/137
|align="left"|The {{w|fine structure constant}} indicates the strength of electromagnetism. It is unitless and around 0.007297, close to 1/137. The joke here is that Randall chose to write 140 as the denominator, when 137 is much closer to reality and just as many digits (although 137 is a less "round" number than 140, and Randall writes in the table that he's "had enough" of it).  At one point the fine structure constant was believed to be exactly the reciprocal of 137, and many people have tried to find a simple formula explaining this (with a pinch of {{w|numerology}} thrown in at times), including the infamous {{w|Arthur Eddington|Sir Arthur "Adding-One" Eddington}} who argued very strenuously that the fine structure constant "should" be 1/136 when that was what the best measurements suggested, and then argued just as strenuously for 1/137 a few years later as measurements improved.
+
|align="left"|The {{w|fine structure constant}} indicates the strength of electromagnetism. It is unitless and around 0.007297, close to 1/137. The joke here is that Randall chose to write 140 as the denominator when 137 is much closer to reality and has just as many digits (although 137 is a less "round" number than 140, and Randall writes in the table that he's "had enough" of it).  At one point the fine structure constant was believed to be exactly the reciprocal of 137, and many people have tried to find a simple formula explaining this (with a pinch of {{w|numerology}} thrown in at times), including the infamous {{w|Arthur Eddington|Sir Arthur "Adding-One" Eddington}} who argued very strenuously that the fine structure constant "should" be 1/136 when that was what the best measurements suggested, and then argued just as strenuously for 1/137 a few years later as measurements improved.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|Fundamental charge
 
|align="center"|Fundamental charge
Line 95: Line 95:
 
|align="center"|0.2024561414932
 
|align="center"|0.2024561414932
 
|align="center"|202-456-1414
 
|align="center"|202-456-1414
|align="left"|
+
|align="left"|Either [[Randall Munroe]] is friends with the President or he works for 9/11 .
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|Jenny's constant
 
|align="center"|Jenny's constant
Line 178: Line 178:
 
2035 — 385<br>
 
2035 — 385<br>
 
|align="center"|
 
|align="center"|
|align="left"|Grows by 3 million each year. As of 2021 the actual number is ~13 million smaller.
+
|align="left"|Grows by 3 million each year. As of 2024, the actual number is ~17 million smaller.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|Electron rest energy (joules)
 
|align="center"|Electron rest energy (joules)
Line 250: Line 250:
 
|align="center"|3.7853981634
 
|align="center"|3.7853981634
 
|align="center"|3.785411784 (exact)
 
|align="center"|3.785411784 (exact)
|align="left"|A U.S. liquid gallon is defined by law as 231 cubic inches. The British imperial gallon would be about 20% larger (but the litre is the same thing as the US liter).
+
|align="left"|A U.S. liquid gallon is defined by law as 231 cubic inches
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|''g''<sub>0</sub> or ''g''<sub>n</sub>
 
|align="center"|''g''<sub>0</sub> or ''g''<sub>n</sub>
Line 256: Line 256:
 
|align="center"|9.8066624898
 
|align="center"|9.8066624898
 
|align="center"|9.80665
 
|align="center"|9.80665
|align="left"|Standard gravity, or standard acceleration due to free fall is the nominal gravitational acceleration of an object in a vacuum near the surface of the Earth. It is defined by standard as 9.80665&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup>, which is exactly 35.30394&nbsp;km/h/s (about 32.174&nbsp;ft/s<sup>2</sup>, or 21.937&nbsp;mph/s). This value was established by the 3rd CGPM (1901, CR 70) and used to define the standard weight of an object as the product of its mass and this nominal acceleration. The acceleration of a body near the surface of the Earth is due to the combined effects of gravity and centrifugal acceleration from rotation of the Earth (but which is small enough to be neglected for most purposes); the total (the apparent gravity) is about 0.5 percent greater at the poles than at the equator.
+
|align="left"|Standard gravity, or standard acceleration due to free fall is the nominal gravitational acceleration of an object in a vacuum near the surface of the Earth. It is defined by standard as 9.80665&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup>, which is exactly 35.30394&nbsp;km/h/s (about 32.174&nbsp;ft/s<sup>2</sup>, or 21.937&nbsp;mph/s). This value was established by the 3rd CGPM (1901, CR 70) and used to define the standard weight of an object as the product of its mass and this nominal acceleration. The acceleration of a body near the surface of the Earth is due to the combined effects of gravity and centrifugal acceleration from the rotation of the Earth (but which is small enough to be neglected for most purposes); the total (the apparent gravity) is about 0.5 per cent greater at the poles than at the equator.
  
Randall used a letter ''g'' without a suffix, which can also mean the local acceleration due to local gravity and centrifugal acceleration, which varies depending on one's position on Earth.
+
Randall used the letter ''g'' without a suffix, which can also mean the local acceleration due to local gravity and centrifugal acceleration, which varies depending on one's position on Earth.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align="center"|Proton–electron mass ratio
 
|align="center"|Proton–electron mass ratio
Line 344: Line 344:
 
&= \frac12 \quad \quad \quad \text{Q.E.D.}
 
&= \frac12 \quad \quad \quad \text{Q.E.D.}
 
\end{align}</math>
 
\end{align}</math>
 
To better see why the equation is true, it is better to go to the complex plane. cos(2k pi/7) <!--<math>\textstyle{ \cos \frac{2k\pi}{7} }</math>--> is the real part of the k-th 7-th root of unity, exp(2 k i pi/7)<!--<math>\textstyle{ \exp \frac{2 k i\pi}{7} }</math>-->. The seven 7-th roots of unity (for 0 <= k <= 6) sum up to zero, hence so do their real parts:
 
 
<!--:<math>0 = \cos \frac{0\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{2\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{4\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{6\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{8\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{10\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{12\pi}{7} </math>-->
 
:0 = cos(0 pi/7) + cos(2 pi/7) + cos(4 pi/7) + cos(6 pi/7) + cos(8 pi/7) + cos(10 pi/7) + cos(12 pi/7)
 
 
But one of these roots is just 1, and all other root go by pairs of conjugate roots, which have the same real part (alternatively, consider that cos(x) = cos(2 pi - x)):
 
 
<!--:<math>0 = 1 + 2 ( \cos \frac{2\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{4\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{6\pi}{7} ) </math>-->
 
:0 = 1 + 2 (cos(2 pi/7) + cos(4 pi/7) + cos(6 pi/7))
 
 
Hence
 
 
<!--:<math>\cos \frac{2\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{4\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{6\pi}{7} = - 1/2 </math>-->
 
:cos(2 pi/7) + cos(4 pi/7) + cos(6 pi/7) = - 1/2
 
 
which, because cos(x) = cos(pi - x),<!--<math>\cos (x) = - \cos(\pi - x)</math>,--> can be rewritten as
 
 
<!--:<math>\cos \frac{5\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{3\pi}{7} + \cos \frac{pi}{7} = 1/2 </math>-->
 
:cos(5 pi/7) + cos(3 pi/7) + cos(pi/7) = 1/2
 
 
Q.E.D.
 
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)