Editing 2195: Dockless Roombas

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* A Roomba is not powerful enough for someone to ride.  At best, a small animal like a cat or squirrel might be able to ride atop one.
 
* A Roomba is not powerful enough for someone to ride.  At best, a small animal like a cat or squirrel might be able to ride atop one.
  
βˆ’
* A Roomba has small wheels and is designed for relatively flat and uniform surfaces.  Even if a person could successfully ride on one, sidewalks have cracks and unevenness and bumps which would lead to a rough ride with lots of opportunities to [https://what-if.xkcd.com/5/ get stuck]. (But riding Roombas has come up on xkcd before, in the Externalities comic)
+
* A Roomba has small wheels and is designed for relatively flat and uniform surfaces.  Even if a person could successfully ride on one, sidewalks have cracks and unevenness and bumps{{cn}} which would lead to a rough ride with lots of opportunities to [https://what-if.xkcd.com/5/ get stuck]. (But riding Roombas has come up on xkcd before, in the Externalities comic)
  
 
* A Roomba requires a way to recharge its batteries and, unladen, generally runs for an hour or so before it needs to be recharged.  That is why it always comes with a dock.  Dockless would imply it would not have a way to recharge.  With a heavy load like a human, one would expect the run time to be drastically less.
 
* A Roomba requires a way to recharge its batteries and, unladen, generally runs for an hour or so before it needs to be recharged.  That is why it always comes with a dock.  Dockless would imply it would not have a way to recharge.  With a heavy load like a human, one would expect the run time to be drastically less.

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)