Editing 2215: Faculty:Student Ratio
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{comic | {{comic | ||
| number = 2215 | | number = 2215 | ||
− | | date = October | + | | date = October 15, 2019 |
| title = Faculty:Student Ratio | | title = Faculty:Student Ratio | ||
| image = faculty_student_ratio.png | | image = faculty_student_ratio.png | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
− | + | {{incomplete|Created by an XKCD UNIVERSITY RESEARCH PAPER - HI. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | |
+ | Schools are usually rated for parents/students to pick which one to attend. One of the metrics that schools use is a {{w|Student–teacher ratio|ratio between the number of faculty members to the number of students}}. Typically this is expressed as student-teacher ratio, but Randall reverses the metric here. Normally, this determines how much teachers get to spend individual time with students. The lower the ratio, i.e. fewer students per teacher, the smaller classes teachers have to teach, and thus notice individual students more. | ||
− | + | Having several different teachers, each of whom excel at a particular area can be helpful to a student. However, having many more teachers than students is usually not economical. | |
− | {{w|Proprietary colleges|For | + | {{w|Proprietary colleges|For profit universities}} and {{w|diploma mills}} may use techniques like this to artificially boost their ratings, or use fabricated metrics and {{w|Accreditation mill}} to give an inflated appearance of value. {{w|Predatory publishing|Predatory publishers}} and conferences are other techniques used to inflate the perceived value of an idea, or pad curriculum vitae. |
− | In the title text, other metrics are skewed in the school's favor: | + | In the title text, other metrics are skewed to be in the school's favor: |
− | *Having a high standard for entry is usually associated with | + | *Having a high standard for entry (which is usually associated with high prestige or better schools) is subverted by the fact that it is near impossible for one to get in, thus making the school undesirable to try and apply to. |
− | *A high | + | *A high amount of research papers would normally indicate a high number of scientific studies conducted at the school, however these research papers are devoid of any sort of useful information. |
− | *A high hiring rate (percentage of students that have gotten a job after education) and a high average salary after graduation is favorable, as it is | + | *A high hiring rate (percentage of students that have gotten a job after education) and a high average salary after graduation is favorable, as it is the endgame for many students attending these types of schools. However, the school in question artificially inflated it by having one out of their one students be hired by them (having a 100% hiring rate) and giving them a starting salary that is very high, but not giving them enough time to actually reasonably gain that amount. $50 trillion/year for 10 microseconds is approximately $15.85 (= 10 / 10^6 / 3600 / 24 / 365 * 50*10^12). Assuming fifty 40-hour work weeks this comes out to <abbr title="69.44=(50e12/2000)*10/(3600*1e6)">$66. 59</abbr>) |
+ | |||
+ | This comic satirizes the very real culture of schools modifying their process to inflate artificial proxies. For instance, some schools will reject students whose test scores, résumé, etc. are much higher than average for the school, since it's likely that college is a "safety school" and the student won't actually go. This can increase the college's rejection rate, a common measure of a school's exclusivity and therefore prestige. However, if the above-average student does want to attend that school, they are unable to, even though it would be good for the college. | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
− | :[Cueball is sitting hunched over a desk writing while ten people crowd around him, five on each side, all leaning towards him. On the left side | + | :[Cueball is sitting hunched over a desk writing while ten people crowd around him, five on each side, all leaning towards him. On the left side they are Hairbun, a Cueball-like man, Hairy, Megan - who speaks, and another Cueball-like man. On the right are Ponytail, a third Cueball-like man, another Megan-like woman, Blondie and finally a fourth Cueball-like man.] |
:Megan: How's the work going? | :Megan: How's the work going? | ||
:Cueball: Can you all at least stand back a little? | :Cueball: Can you all at least stand back a little? | ||
Line 38: | Line 41: | ||
[[Category:Comics featuring Blondie]] | [[Category:Comics featuring Blondie]] | ||
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]] | [[Category:Multiple Cueballs]] | ||
− |