Editing 222: Small Talk

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
βˆ’
[[Cueball]] is approached by his friend who offers one of the standard {{w|greeting}}s of, "What's Up? How've you been?" In standard "small talk," an appropriate answer would be only one or two words (e.g. "Fine" or "Pretty good"). These are generally positive responses, with negative ones only offered in extreme circumstances. In this situation, Cueball forgets that this type of answer is what his friend is expecting. Instead, he contemplates thoroughly on his condition, wanting to provide accurate, detailed information to his friend. His response sheds light on the many layers of meaning a simple question such as "What's up?" can have. His friend, thrown off by the delayed response, snaps his fingers to regain Cueball's attention and reminds him that they are having a conversation, which is best facilitated by the standard short responses.
+
[[Cueball]] is approached by his friend who offers the standard greeting of, "What's Up? How've you been?" In standard "small talk," an appropriate answer would be only one or two words (e.g. "Fine", "Pretty good"). These are generally positive responses, with negative ones only offered in extreme circumstances. In this situation, Cueball forgets that this type of answer is what his friend is expecting. Instead, he contemplates thoroughly on his condition, wanting to provide accurate, detailed information to his friend. His response sheds light on the many layers of meaning a simple question such as "What's up?" can have. His friend, thrown off by the delayed response, snaps to regain Cueball's attention and reminds him that they are having a conversation, which is best facilitated by the standard short responses.
  
 
The title text shows that Cueball was more interested in accuracy than the ease of the conversation, simply out of respect for his friend.
 
The title text shows that Cueball was more interested in accuracy than the ease of the conversation, simply out of respect for his friend.
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:[Three overlapping identical frames of the two Cueballs standing next to each other indicate the passage of time.]
 
:[Three overlapping identical frames of the two Cueballs standing next to each other indicate the passage of time.]
  
βˆ’
:[The Cueball on the left snaps his fingers at the Cueball on the right.]
+
:[The Cueball on the left snaps his fingers at the Cueball on the right]
 
:Friend: Uh, you ok?
 
:Friend: Uh, you ok?
 
:Cueball: Yeah! It's just an interesting question. I'm trying to decide what best sums up my--
 
:Cueball: Yeah! It's just an interesting question. I'm trying to decide what best sums up my--

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)