Editing 2295: Garbage Math

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
 +
{{incomplete|Created by a ZILOG Z80. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
 +
 
This comic illustrates the "{{w|garbage in, garbage out}}" concept using mathematical expressions. It shows how, if you have garbage as inputs to your calculations, then you will likely get garbage as a result, except when you multiply by zero, which eliminates all uncertainty of the result.  
 
This comic illustrates the "{{w|garbage in, garbage out}}" concept using mathematical expressions. It shows how, if you have garbage as inputs to your calculations, then you will likely get garbage as a result, except when you multiply by zero, which eliminates all uncertainty of the result.  
  
Line 24: Line 26:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Precise number × Precise number = Slightly less precise number
 
|Precise number × Precise number = Slightly less precise number
|<math>\mathop\sigma(X\times Y)\cong</math><br><br><math>\sqrt{\mathop\sigma(X)\times Y^2+\mathop\sigma(Y)\times X^2}</math>
+
|<math>\mathop\sigma(X\times Y)\approx</math><br><br><math>\sqrt{\mathop\sigma(X)\times Y^2+\mathop\sigma(Y)\times X^2}</math>
 
|Here, instead of absolute error, relative error will be added. For example, if our precise numbers are 1 (±10<sup>-6</sup>) and 1 (±10<sup>-6</sup>), then our product is 1 (±2·10<sup>-6</sup>).
 
|Here, instead of absolute error, relative error will be added. For example, if our precise numbers are 1 (±10<sup>-6</sup>) and 1 (±10<sup>-6</sup>), then our product is 1 (±2·10<sup>-6</sup>).
 
|-
 
|-
Line 32: Line 34:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Precise number × Garbage = Garbage
 
|Precise number × Garbage = Garbage
|<math>\mathop\sigma(X\times Y)\cong</math><br><br><math>\sqrt{\mathop\sigma(X)\times Y^2+\mathop\sigma(Y)\times X^2}</math>
+
|<math>\mathop\sigma(X\times Y)\approx</math><br><br><math>\sqrt{\mathop\sigma(X)\times Y^2+\mathop\sigma(Y)\times X^2}</math>
 
|Likewise, if one of the numbers has a high relative error, then this error will be propagated to the product. Here, this is independent of the sizes of the numbers.
 
|Likewise, if one of the numbers has a high relative error, then this error will be propagated to the product. Here, this is independent of the sizes of the numbers.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|√<span style="border-top:1px solid; padding:0 0.1em;">Garbage</span> = Less bad garbage
 
|√<span style="border-top:1px solid; padding:0 0.1em;">Garbage</span> = Less bad garbage
|<math>\mathop\sigma(\sqrt X)\cong\frac{\mathop\sigma(X)}{2\times\sqrt X} </math>
+
|<math>\mathop\sigma(\sqrt X)\approx\frac{\mathop\sigma(X)}{2\times\sqrt X} </math>
 
| When the square root of a number is computed, its relative error will be halved. Depending on the application, this might not be all that much ''better'', but it's at least ''less bad''.
 
| When the square root of a number is computed, its relative error will be halved. Depending on the application, this might not be all that much ''better'', but it's at least ''less bad''.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Garbage<sup>2</sup> = Worse garbage
 
|Garbage<sup>2</sup> = Worse garbage
|<math>\mathop\sigma(X^2)\cong2\times X\times\mathop\sigma(X)</math>
+
|<math>\mathop\sigma(X^2)\approx2\times X\times\mathop\sigma(X)</math>
 
|Likewise, when a number is squared, its relative error will be doubled. This is a corollary to multiplication adding relative errors.
 
|Likewise, when a number is squared, its relative error will be doubled. This is a corollary to multiplication adding relative errors.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 48: Line 50:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Precise number<sup>Garbage</sup> = Much worse garbage
 
|Precise number<sup>Garbage</sup> = Much worse garbage
|<math>\mathop\sigma(b^X)\cong|b^X|\times\mathop{\mathrm{ln}}b\times\sigma(X)</math>
+
|<math>\mathop\sigma(b^X)\approx|b^X|\times\mathop{\mathrm{ln}}b\times\sigma(X)</math>
 
|The exponent is very sensitive to changes, which may also magnify the effect based on the magnitude of the precise number.
 
|The exponent is very sensitive to changes, which may also magnify the effect based on the magnitude of the precise number.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 56: Line 58:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|<math>\frac{\text{Precise number}}{\text{Garbage}-\text{Garbage}}</math> = Much worse garbage, possible division by zero
 
|<math>\frac{\text{Precise number}}{\text{Garbage}-\text{Garbage}}</math> = Much worse garbage, possible division by zero
|<math>\mathop\sigma\left(\frac{a}{X-Y}\right)\cong</math><br><br><math>\frac {|a|}{(X-Y)^2}\times\sqrt{\mathop\sigma(X)^2+\mathop\sigma(Y)^2}</math>{{fact}}
+
|<math>\mathop\sigma\left(\frac{a}{X-Y}\right)\approx</math><br><br><math>\frac {|a|}{(X-Y)^2}\times\sqrt{\mathop\sigma(X)^2+\mathop\sigma(Y)^2}</math>{{fact}}
 
|Indeed, as with above, if error bars overlap then we might end up dividing by zero.
 
|Indeed, as with above, if error bars overlap then we might end up dividing by zero.
 
|-
 
|-
Line 64: Line 66:
 
|}
 
|}
  
The title text refers to the computer science maxim of "garbage in, garbage out," which states that when it comes to computer code, supplying incorrect initial data will produce incorrect results, even if the code itself accurately does what it is supposed to do. As we can see above, however, when plugging data into mathematical formulas, this can possibly magnify the error of our input data, though there are ways to reduce this error (such as aggregating data). Therefore, the quantity of garbage is not necessarily {{w|Conservation law|conserved}}, in contrast to other scientific quantities like energy and momentum that are always conserved. Alternatively, this could be take as a pun on environmental conservation efforts, which can often involve recycling one's trash. However, the computer science maxim of "garbage in, garbage out," has nothing to do with actual garbage.
+
The title text refers to the computer science maxim of "garbage in, garbage out," which states that when it comes to computer code, supplying incorrect initial data will produce incorrect results, even if the code itself accurately does what it is supposed to do. As we can see above, however, when plugging data into mathematical formulas, this can possibly magnify the error of our input data, though there are ways to reduce this error (such as aggregating data). Therefore, the quantity of garbage is not necessarily {{w|Conservation law|conserved}}, in contrast to other scientific quantities like energy and momentum that are always conserved.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)