Editing 2516: Hubble Tension

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
 
+
{{incomplete|Created by Dave - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
[[Ponytail]] is telling [[Cueball]] about the {{w|expansion of the universe}} telling him that there are three main estimates of the rate of expansion, and that they all disagree. She then tells him of the two well known (and very complicated) methods, and finally the joke is that the third method is performed by a guy named Dave (who replies from off-panel), and he claims to measure the speeds with a radar gun, as if the galaxies were speeding here on Earth.
+
The fact that most galaxies are receding from us, and that the distance to the galaxy is directly proportional to the speed (as measured by {{w|red-shift}}) was discovered in the 1920s by {{w|Edwin Hubble}} and others. This constant of proportionality is known as the {{w|Hubble Constant}}.
 
 
The fact that most {{w|galaxies}} are receding from us, and that the distance to the galaxy is directly proportional to the speed (as measured by {{w|red-shift}}) was discovered in the 1920s by {{w|Edwin Hubble}} and others. This constant of proportionality is known as the {{w|Hubble Constant}}.
 
  
 
One way of measuring the Hubble Constant is to measure the distance to (relatively) nearby galaxies. Once distance is obtained, speed can be easily obtained by measuring the red-shift and thus the Hubble Constant calculated. Measuring the distance turns out to be fiendishly difficult because a distant bright star looks the same as a dim star that is closer, and localized movements can influence the speed of recession — though less significantly, for multiple reasons, the further away are the objects that you study.
 
One way of measuring the Hubble Constant is to measure the distance to (relatively) nearby galaxies. Once distance is obtained, speed can be easily obtained by measuring the red-shift and thus the Hubble Constant calculated. Measuring the distance turns out to be fiendishly difficult because a distant bright star looks the same as a dim star that is closer, and localized movements can influence the speed of recession — though less significantly, for multiple reasons, the further away are the objects that you study.
Line 25: Line 23:
 
Putting these together, the best measurement of the Hubble Constant is 73 km/s/Mparsec.
 
Putting these together, the best measurement of the Hubble Constant is 73 km/s/Mparsec.
  
This is in conflict with the other main way of measuring the Hubble Constant, analyzing makeup of the {{w|Cosmic Microwave Background}} (CMB) radiation, which yields a value of 68 km/s/Mparsec. The difference is statistically significant, and well outside the error bounds of each measurement.
+
This is in conflict with the other main way of measuring the Hubble Constant, analyzing makeup of the {{w|Cosmic Microwave Background}} radiation, which yields a value of 68 km/s/Mparsec. The difference is statistically significant, and well outside the error bounds of each measurement.
  
Since the CMB technique relies on our understanding and assumptions about the early universe, as well as on the cosmological effects of General Relativity on large scales, if this discrepancy proved real it could be the gateway to new discoveries in cosmology and gravity, as well as possibly shed light on the origin of the universe and a '{{w|Theory Of Everything}}'. Cosmologists got quite excited about this. It might also be that there was a previously unaccounted-for error in any of the rungs of the cosmological distance ladder and, once that is fixed, the two results will be consistent.
+
Since the CMB technique relies on our understanding and assumptions about the early universe, as well as on the cosmological effects of General Relativity on large scales, if this discrepancy proved real it could be the gateway to new discoveries in cosmology and gravity, as well as possibly shed light on the origin of the universe and a '{{w|Theory Of Everything}}'. Cosmologists got quite excited about this. It might also be that there was a previously unaccounted-for error in any of the rungs of the cosmological distance ladder, and that once that is fixed, the two results will be consistent.
  
The third method introduced in this comic is a guy named Dave who is trying to use a {{w|radar speed gun}} (as used by the police for detecting speeding cars) to try to measure the movement of astronomical bodies.  A radar system works by sending electromagnetic radiation from the gun and then measuring the returned radiation to determine how far away or how fast a moderately distant object is moving.  Because of the transmission and return times required (and the inverse-square law), a radar device will only be able to get information about the very closest objects, such as the Moon (a type of {{w|Earth–Moon–Earth communication|Moon bounce}}) and other objects orbiting the Earth (or ''perhaps'' the Sun), where the influence of being in orbit utterly dominates over any possible Hubble-shift. Doing that still needs very powerful radar systems like the former {{w|Arecibo Telescope}} to be able to get any useful information from that far away; a hand-held radar gun would not be able to 'lock on' across those distances, let alone distant galaxies.
+
The third method introduced in this comic is a guy named Dave who is trying to use a {{w|radar speed gun}} (as used by the police for detecting speeding cars) to try to measure the movement of astronomical bodies.  A radar system works by sending electromagnetic radiation from the gun and then measuring the returned radiation to determine how far away or how fast a moderately distant object is moving.  Because of the transmission and return times required (and the inverse-square law), a radar device will only be able to get information about the very closest objects, such as the Moon and other objects orbiting the Earth (or the ''perhaps'' the Sun), where the influence of being in orbit utterly dominates over any possible Hubble-shift. And that still needs powerful radar systems like the former {{w|Arecibo Telescope}} to be able to get any useful information that far away, a hand-held radar gun would not be able to 'lock on' across even those distances.
  
Going by back-calculating grossly 'idealized' universe models, as suggested by the other two estimates, a receding velocity of 85 miles per hour ('mph'; about 137 kilometers per hour, 'kph' or 'km/h') should be seen at a distance of roughly 1700-1850 light-years, on the order of the thickness of our galactic disc. Much too far to use a radar gun on, also much too close to exclude any significant galactic stellar motions. Much the same is true if the figure is actually 85 kph (1050-1130 ly), as suggested it might be in the title text.
+
Going by back-calculating grossly 'idealized' universe models, as suggested by the other two estimates, a receding velocity of 85MPH (85 miles per hour or 136.8 kilometers per hour, KPH or km/h) should be seen at a distance of roughly 1700-1850 light-years, on the order of the thickness of our galactic disc. Much too far to use a radar gun on, also much too close to exclude any significant galactic stellar motions. Much the same is true if the figure is actually 85KPH (km (1050-1130 ly), as suggested it might be in the title text. It is also dimensional wrong, as it is quoted as a straight "distance per time", not "distance per time ''per distance''".
  
Aside from being practically incorrect, that value of 85 kph relates to around 53 mph, which might be the normally observed traffic speed on certain roads (especially if someone is conspicuously using a radar gun!) if by 'all directions' you effectively mean 'both directions' of traffic flow that Dave could possibly be measuring. Dave may have been referring to the kind of {{w|Ford Galaxy|Galaxy}} that he ''can'' more easily find out the velocity of.
+
Aside from being practically incorrect, that value of 85KPH relates to around 53MPH, which might be the normally observed traffic speed on certain roads (especially if someone is conspicuously using a radar gun!) if by 'all directions' you effectively mean 'both directions' of traffic flow that Dave could possibly be measuring. Dave is probably referring to the these kind of {{w|Ford Galaxy|Galaxies}} (the car brand from Ford), which he might observe speeding all the time.
 
 
The comic is likely making fun of the common internet phenomenon of amateur (wannabe?) scientists seeking to discredit established scientific facts by reporting the results of experiments made using everyday tools.  Dave has probably heard of the fact that there is no agreement in the scientific measurements of the Hubble constant and decided to try to settle the controversy using the tools at his disposal, without remotely realizing that the margin of error required in the measurements is well outside the range of what can be used with conventional objects.
 
 
 
Dave might also lack an understanding of units of measure and dimensions. Ponytail describes the measurements of the rate of universal expansion, a speed that varies with distance, in km/s/Mparsec, having dimension 1/T or 1/time. Dave made his measurements in miles/hour or km/h, which have dimension L/T or length/time. These are not comparable with the official units. Dave does not appear to be aware of this (and Ponytail does not draw Cueball or Dave's attention to it).
 
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
:[Cueball and Ponytail are walking to the right. Ponytail has her palm raised.]
+
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
 +
:[Cueball and Ponytail are walking to the right. Ponytail has her palm raised]
 
:Ponytail: There are three main estimates of the universe's expansion rate and they all disagree.
 
:Ponytail: There are three main estimates of the universe's expansion rate and they all disagree.
  
Line 49: Line 44:
 
:Ponytail: Measurements of the cosmic microwave background suggest it's expanding at 68 km/s/megaparsec.
 
:Ponytail: Measurements of the cosmic microwave background suggest it's expanding at 68 km/s/megaparsec.
  
:[They continue walking to the right. Ponytail points towards Dave who replies from off-panel to the right.]
+
:[They continue walking to the right. Ponytail points to Dave, off screen]
 
:Ponytail: And Dave, who has a radar gun, says it's expanding at 85 mph in all directions.
 
:Ponytail: And Dave, who has a radar gun, says it's expanding at 85 mph in all directions.
:Dave (off-panel): ''Those galaxies are really booking it!''
+
:Dave (off-screen): ''Those galaxies are really booking it!''
 
:Ponytail: Thanks, Dave.
 
:Ponytail: Thanks, Dave.
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]
 
[[Category:Physics]]
 
[[Category:Physics]]

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)