Editing 894: Progeny

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 4: Line 4:
 
| title    = Progeny
 
| title    = Progeny
 
| image    = progeny.png
 
| image    = progeny.png
 +
| imagesize =
 
| titletext = I tell my children 'it's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.' I'm trying to take the edge off their competitive drive to ensure that I can always beat them.
 
| titletext = I tell my children 'it's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.' I'm trying to take the edge off their competitive drive to ensure that I can always beat them.
 
}}
 
}}
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
This comic is a reference to IBM's computer {{w|Watson (computer)|Watson}} that beat humans at {{w|Jeopardy}} (see [[1002: Game AIs]]). The IBM team created a computer that could formulate a response to a Jeopardy-style question. Jeopardy is a game played where the contestants are given the answer to a question, and must devise the question. A question might be "Its largest airport was named for a World War II hero; its second largest, for a World War II battle", to which the contestant must answer "What is Chicago?". When going up against two Jeopardy champions, Watson was able to {{w|Watson (computer)#Jeopardy!|beat them both}} (by some margin, although he did answer the above-mentioned question incorrectly with "Toronto").
+
This comic is a reference to IBM's computer {{w|Watson (computer)|Watson}} that beat humans at {{w|Jeopardy}} (see [[1002: Game AIs]]). The IBM team created a computer that could formulate a response to a Jeopardy-style question. In case you are not familiar, Jeopardy is a game played where the contestants are given the answer to a question, and must devise the question. A question might be "The United States joined this war in 1941" to which the contestant must answer "What is World War II?". When going up against two Jeopardy champions, Watson was able to beat them both ({{w|Watson_(computer)#Jeopardy.21|and not too shoddily either}}).
  
[[Megan]] chimes in that we are "pretty awesome at teaching" which is very true. Humans are the best (on this planet) at teaching other things to do a set of tasks. We train dogs, cats, lizards{{Actual citation needed}}, birds, other people, and now we are getting quite good at ''teaching'' a computer, a simple machine completely of our own design, to mimic our own thought patterns and make decisions similar to what we would make. (See also [[1263: Reassuring]]). It can also be argued that building a machine proficient in a task is equally if not more impressive than being proficient in the task yourself. Thus, humans have nothing less to be proud of.
+
[[Megan]] chimes in that we are "pretty awesome at teaching" which is very true. Humans are the best (on this planet) at teaching other things to do a set of tasks. We train dogs, cats, lizards, birds, other people, and now we are getting quite good at getting a computer, a simple machine completely of our own design, to mimic our own thought patterns and make decisions similar to what we would make.
  
The title text makes fun of teaching our children values about not trying to win by any means (i.e. but while playing fair) by suggesting we are just trying to hold on to our ability to beat them in something.
+
The title text makes fun of teaching our children values by suggesting we are just trying to hold on to our ability to beat them in something.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
 
:[Cueball sits at a computer; Megan stands behind him.]
 
:[Cueball sits at a computer; Megan stands behind him.]
:Cueball: Wow — researchers taught a computer to beat the world's best humans at yet ''another'' task. Does our species have ''anything'' left to be proud of?
+
:Cueball: Wow — researchers taught a computer to beat the world's best humans at yet ''ANOTHER'' task. Does our species have ''ANYTHING'' left to be proud of?
 
:Megan: Well, it sounds like we're pretty awesome at teaching.
 
:Megan: Well, it sounds like we're pretty awesome at teaching.
:Cueball: Huh? What good is ''that''?
+
:Cueball: Huh? What good is ''THAT''?
  
{{comic discussion}}
+
==Trivia==
 +
*Human discomfort at computers outdoing them in some field is revisited in [[1263: Reassuring]].
 +
 
 +
{{comic discussion}}  
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]
[[Category:Computers]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)