Editing Talk:1099: Tuesdays

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 6: Line 6:
 
May I pedantically point out that our hero's wings ''do'' have ends...  Each has one end at least at its wingtip, even if it appears they are both unlimited in the distance from that wingtip to the unknown attachment to his back (and that attachment, or feed mechanism, hides a potentially unlimited amount of wing by unknown means, leaving them without another end).  A "hoop" of wing (or arbitrary size, and not necessarily excessively so) would be endless...  I've made paper planes with that sort of idea behind their 'wing' surface, and there's at least one 'perpendicular frisbee-like' thing out there in the toy shops.  (Mobius wings could also be imagined, often being thought of as more "endless" than a simple non-mobius belt, but I'm sure they'd actually be worse at flight.)
 
May I pedantically point out that our hero's wings ''do'' have ends...  Each has one end at least at its wingtip, even if it appears they are both unlimited in the distance from that wingtip to the unknown attachment to his back (and that attachment, or feed mechanism, hides a potentially unlimited amount of wing by unknown means, leaving them without another end).  A "hoop" of wing (or arbitrary size, and not necessarily excessively so) would be endless...  I've made paper planes with that sort of idea behind their 'wing' surface, and there's at least one 'perpendicular frisbee-like' thing out there in the toy shops.  (Mobius wings could also be imagined, often being thought of as more "endless" than a simple non-mobius belt, but I'm sure they'd actually be worse at flight.)
  
βˆ’
Secondly, I've recently heard the term "bottomless cup" being commented on by a comedian (I forget who) who has asserted that that's "just a tube".  But that's at best merely a ''related'' bit of observational/absurdist comedy, and not really relevant to the given comic. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.141.216|178.98.141.216]] 13:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
+
Secondly, I've recently heard the term "bottomless cup" being commented on by a comedian (I forget who) who has asserted that that's "just a tube".  But that's at best merely a ''related'' bit of observational/absurdist comedy, and not really relevent to the given comic. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.141.216|178.98.141.216]] 13:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
  
 
Note how the girl on the right, presumably Megan, does not start screaming until the wings start increasing in size...
 
Note how the girl on the right, presumably Megan, does not start screaming until the wings start increasing in size...

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)