Talk:1258: First

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 22:29, 30 August 2013 by (talk) (Asked about specific "Internet behaviors" that may be referenced)
Jump to: navigation, search

First! Edo (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

This is a wiki, not some xkcd reader's blog. GameZone (talk) 04:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
(it's called a joke) Edo (talk) 04:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I thought it was funny. 07:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I actually would have been slightly disappointed if someone hadn't made a "First!" comment for this particular comic. Only slightly, though, because that would mean I would've been able to do it. 18:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Ha! I was going to do the same thing. --Druid816 (talk) 07:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

When I saw today's comic on, I came here just to check if someone made a "First!" comment in comic's discussion page. 08:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Yep, I wanted to come here and post "first!" I thought that would be fun and original. Porkypine (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I also only came by to make sure the first thing in Discussion was "First," as is appropriate.

I agree it is likely Megan offscreen, but can we be sure? 09:57, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Is Megan the canonical name for the long-haired brunette? Interesting... 12:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes. See 159:_Boombox --Rael (talk) 14:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I corrected the indents, dont be mad at me :) 12:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Can someone explain what it means? I first guessed it was the proliferation on the "exactly zero" sentence, but it can also means "not comments at all". 12:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

He is being ironic because there have been so many annoying internet behaviours have come about. 13:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Could also be self referencing, as massive use of irony can be considered an annoying internet behaviour. -- 13:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
If someone comes with a new annoying behavior, it will be the first! 14:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I get that there are annoying Internet behavior, and idiocy on the Web is pretty much unavoidable, but are there any new, specific behaviors that we can put in the explanation rather than just telling people how obvious it is? (I'm not just complaining, if it came across that way. I would offer examples if I could think of any.) 22:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)DBrak