Editing Talk:1435: Presidential Alert
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::And the Shinto. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 15:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | ::::And the Shinto. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 15:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::Ummm.... Shinto literally means "way of the gods". Followers of Shinto have lots of gods. We would just normally think of them as guardian spirits or something like that. Also, buddhas are essentially gods in the Shinto sense. That said, there are a lot of very different schools of Buddhism, and I am most familiar with the ones that were influenced by Shinto in Japan. ETA: Oh, the comment that you responded to is about supernatural beings, not necessarily gods. In that case, Shinto definitely applies with no disclaimer, and every branch of Buddhism that I am familiar with applies as well.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.153|108.162.221.153]] 04:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | :::::Ummm.... Shinto literally means "way of the gods". Followers of Shinto have lots of gods. We would just normally think of them as guardian spirits or something like that. Also, buddhas are essentially gods in the Shinto sense. That said, there are a lot of very different schools of Buddhism, and I am most familiar with the ones that were influenced by Shinto in Japan. ETA: Oh, the comment that you responded to is about supernatural beings, not necessarily gods. In that case, Shinto definitely applies with no disclaimer, and every branch of Buddhism that I am familiar with applies as well.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.153|108.162.221.153]] 04:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
::::Don't forget the atheists. Despite all their peceived superiority and claimed belief exclusively in science, atheism is a religion. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 15:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Mulan15262 | ::::Don't forget the atheists. Despite all their peceived superiority and claimed belief exclusively in science, atheism is a religion. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 15:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Mulan15262 | ||
:::::Atheism to religion as bald to a hair style. Valid, but flawed reasoning. Taking the hair out of hairstyling doesn't constitute a new hairstyle. Atheists form something close to a cult, but not a blind one. We see organized religion, but not organized atheism. Science is provable and logically sound. It has repeatability. It doesn't condemn you to hell if you don't believe. It is the same whether or not you believe or care about it. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.113|108.162.217.113]] 22:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)BK | :::::Atheism to religion as bald to a hair style. Valid, but flawed reasoning. Taking the hair out of hairstyling doesn't constitute a new hairstyle. Atheists form something close to a cult, but not a blind one. We see organized religion, but not organized atheism. Science is provable and logically sound. It has repeatability. It doesn't condemn you to hell if you don't believe. It is the same whether or not you believe or care about it. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.113|108.162.217.113]] 22:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)BK | ||
::::::Dictionary.com defines religion as being "a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:" This seems like it would fit atheism as it has a fundamental set of beliefs (Believing that there is no God or gods) and practices (Claiming one's belief in the absence of deities to be true). This sounds like it fits the definition to me.[[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 14:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | ::::::Dictionary.com defines religion as being "a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:" This seems like it would fit atheism as it has a fundamental set of beliefs (Believing that there is no God or gods) and practices (Claiming one's belief in the absence of deities to be true). This sounds like it fits the definition to me.[[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 14:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
:: There are arguments regarding talking about your capital-G God ((one) proper name of the generic christian god) as opposed to talking about your small-g god (who might have a specific name, whether Jehova, Allah, Osiris, Odin, Quetzovercoatl or, indeed, God). But that's for etymologists to discuss, probably. Or entomologists, when they're fed up talking about whether Bugs are bugs and are trying to relax by not talking shop. HTH, HAND. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.118|141.101.99.118]] 10:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | :: There are arguments regarding talking about your capital-G God ((one) proper name of the generic christian god) as opposed to talking about your small-g god (who might have a specific name, whether Jehova, Allah, Osiris, Odin, Quetzovercoatl or, indeed, God). But that's for etymologists to discuss, probably. Or entomologists, when they're fed up talking about whether Bugs are bugs and are trying to relax by not talking shop. HTH, HAND. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.118|141.101.99.118]] 10:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
Line 49: | Line 47: | ||
So this happened for real just a week later? http://www.infowars.com/white-house-emergency-alert-interrupts-tv-viewers-across-america/ {{unsigned|Geoffhazel}} | So this happened for real just a week later? http://www.infowars.com/white-house-emergency-alert-interrupts-tv-viewers-across-america/ {{unsigned|Geoffhazel}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |