Editing Talk:1460: SMFW
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Reading this is like listening to the video of that lady who imitates the sound patterns of different languages, but without actually saying any real words! --[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] ([[User talk:Elipongo|talk]]) 05:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | Reading this is like listening to the video of that lady who imitates the sound patterns of different languages, but without actually saying any real words! --[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] ([[User talk:Elipongo|talk]]) 05:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:link? -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 15:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | :link? -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 15:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
::https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybcvlxivscw [[Special:Contributions/199.27.130.192|199.27.130.192]] 19:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ::https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybcvlxivscw [[Special:Contributions/199.27.130.192|199.27.130.192]] 19:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:No. It's absolutely '''nothing''' like that. If this were reddit I'd downvote you. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.180|173.245.54.180]] 19:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC) | :No. It's absolutely '''nothing''' like that. If this were reddit I'd downvote you. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.180|173.245.54.180]] 19:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
It would sound more natural if it were "''SMFW '''as''' an acronym almost makes sense''". Is the fact that "as" was omitted from that sentence supposed to give us a hint as to what "SMFW" might mean? [[User:Nicksh|Nicksh]] ([[User talk:Nicksh|talk]]) 07:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | It would sound more natural if it were "''SMFW '''as''' an acronym almost makes sense''". Is the fact that "as" was omitted from that sentence supposed to give us a hint as to what "SMFW" might mean? [[User:Nicksh|Nicksh]] ([[User talk:Nicksh|talk]]) 07:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
: As "the Internet is for porn", in many contexts SFW, lit. Safe for Work, can be taken to mean sex-free content, while NSFW, Not Safe for Work, would mean sex-positive content, then SMFW might be interpreted to me SM For Work, where SM would be humorously interpreted as some graphically explicit sex-positive content, perhaps SadoMachoism, which outside of paperwork is generally classified NSFW. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.29|199.27.133.29]] 10:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | : As "the Internet is for porn", in many contexts SFW, lit. Safe for Work, can be taken to mean sex-free content, while NSFW, Not Safe for Work, would mean sex-positive content, then SMFW might be interpreted to me SM For Work, where SM would be humorously interpreted as some graphically explicit sex-positive content, perhaps SadoMachoism, which outside of paperwork is generally classified NSFW. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.29|199.27.133.29]] 10:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Line 119: | Line 113: | ||
SMHO is similar to SWMBO, "She Who Must Be Obeyed"; a passive aggressive reference to one's wife. Also why has no one noted that the title of the comic itself is a false acronym? XKCD stands for nothing. Randall is so meta even this comic… [[User:Saspic45|Saspic45]] ([[User talk:Saspic45|talk]]) 14:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC) | SMHO is similar to SWMBO, "She Who Must Be Obeyed"; a passive aggressive reference to one's wife. Also why has no one noted that the title of the comic itself is a false acronym? XKCD stands for nothing. Randall is so meta even this comic… [[User:Saspic45|Saspic45]] ([[User talk:Saspic45|talk]]) 14:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ||
SMFW = so much fun when. "So much fun when an acronym almost makes sense." | SMFW = so much fun when. "So much fun when an acronym almost makes sense." | ||
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.49|108.162.216.49]] 14:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.49|108.162.216.49]] 14:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Line 125: | Line 119: | ||
I went ahead and added the bit about xkcd not standing for anything.[[User:Saspic45|Saspic45]] ([[User talk:Saspic45|talk]]) 22:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC) | I went ahead and added the bit about xkcd not standing for anything.[[User:Saspic45|Saspic45]] ([[User talk:Saspic45|talk]]) 22:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | + | Current last line of article: | |
− | + | ''"It's not actually an acronym. It's just a word with no phonetic pronunciation -- a treasured and carefully-guarded point in the space of four-character strings."'' | |
− | |||
− | + | Which is why I called it a '''false''' acronym. It has the appearance of a typical acronym, but stands for nothing and can't really be pronounced properly in English. I also included Randall's explanation that it's not an actual acronym. The fact he had to point this out is proof that "xkcd" '''resembles''' an acronym. | |
− | The | + | Anyway, shouldn't that comment have been in the discussion? The way it's phrased it sounds more like a comment than part of the explanation. Thanks.[[User:Saspic45|Saspic45]] ([[User talk:Saspic45|talk]]) 12:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC) |