Editing Talk:1584: Moments of Inspiration

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Umm, why is there a "citation needed" when stating that beaks are not a typical property of human children! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.220|162.158.34.220]] 10:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 
: Did you click on the link in the citation needed? It's a joke [[User:Danish|Danish]] ([[User talk:Danish|talk]]) 14:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 
 
 
Needs to explain who Lise Meitner is - I'd never heard of her, she's not on a level with the others in public consciousness. {{unsigned ip|141.101.70.43}}
 
Needs to explain who Lise Meitner is - I'd never heard of her, she's not on a level with the others in public consciousness. {{unsigned ip|141.101.70.43}}
 
: Using Marie Skłodowska Curie (instead of Lise Meitner) would be more understandable - both of them made groundbreaking discoveries in radioactivity research and Ms Curie is definitely more famous than Ms Meitner. But the author probably did not want to join everyone else in using Ms Curie as "the only one token lady scientist" - as discussed in [[896: Marie Curie]], where Lise Meitner (as well as Emmy Noether) is mentioned.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.106.77|141.101.106.77]] 07:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
: Using Marie Skłodowska Curie (instead of Lise Meitner) would be more understandable - both of them made groundbreaking discoveries in radioactivity research and Ms Curie is definitely more famous than Ms Meitner. But the author probably did not want to join everyone else in using Ms Curie as "the only one token lady scientist" - as discussed in [[896: Marie Curie]], where Lise Meitner (as well as Emmy Noether) is mentioned.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.106.77|141.101.106.77]] 07:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Line 12: Line 9:
 
--[[User:Lou Crazy|Lou Crazy]] ([[User talk:Lou Crazy|talk]]) 09:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Lou Crazy|Lou Crazy]] ([[User talk:Lou Crazy|talk]]) 09:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
:May Mildred be [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Lager Mildred Lager]? An "american pioneer of natural foods and health food", but there's no mention of "John" in this article. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.217|162.158.114.217]] 11:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
:May Mildred be [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Lager Mildred Lager]? An "american pioneer of natural foods and health food", but there's no mention of "John" in this article. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.217|162.158.114.217]] 11:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
 
::I doubt it since Mildred Larger was born after Darwin's death.  I was wondering too who they might be, but I'm coming up empty. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 12:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
::I doubt it since Mildred Larger was born after Darwin's death.  I was wondering too who they might be, but I'm coming up empty. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 12:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
I'd like to point out that Newton really was inspired by watching apple fall, that isn't a myth. The myth is that he was actually hit by the apple. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton#Apple_incident [[User:KingSupernova|KingSupernova]] ([[User talk:KingSupernova|talk]]) 12:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
I'd like to point out that Newton really was inspired by watching apple fall, that isn't a myth. The myth is that he was actually hit by the apple. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton#Apple_incident [[User:KingSupernova|KingSupernova]] ([[User talk:KingSupernova|talk]]) 12:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  
 
according to the german wikipedia, today's the tenth birthday of xkcd. i wonder if there's a connection between that and this strip's title... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.157|162.158.114.157]] 14:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
according to the german wikipedia, today's the tenth birthday of xkcd. i wonder if there's a connection between that and this strip's title... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.157|162.158.114.157]] 14:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
This comic seems to be about our desire to have neat stories that explain scientific discoveries. Each panel has an increasingly ridiculous story that explains a "Moment of Inspiration".  [[User:Bartash|Bartash]] ([[User talk:Bartash|talk]]) 16:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
 
The phrase "Hey Lise" seems like a possible Simpsons reference? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.239|141.101.98.239]] 18:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
:Since she is called {{w|Lisa Simpson}} not Lise, and since Meitner is called Lise I do not see this at all...--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 
 
This comic may or may not be inspired by SMBC http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2353 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.42|162.158.93.42]] 19:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 
 
 
The explanation says Darwin had understood Mendel's work on genetics. I understand that there is no evidence he read Mendel's work, or understood the implications it had for the theory of evolution. I know some have claimed he had some version of Mendel's work in his papers when he died, but this appears to be disputed and I have never seen any evidence. Considering the profound implications Medelian inheritance would have on the theory I'd  have thought Darwin would have mentioned it if he was aware...[[User:Magdalen|Magdalen]] ([[User talk:Magdalen|talk]]) 19:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 
Reference for the Darwin Mendel situation: http://members.shaw.ca/mcfetridge/darwin.html [[User:Magdalen|Magdalen]] ([[User talk:Magdalen|talk]]) 19:41, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 
:Yes I agree that this is also what can be read on the wiki page for Mendel (at the bottom of this paragraph on {{w|Gregor_Mendel#Experiments_on_plant_hybridization}}. I will alter the explanation. But it is though correct that he worried about inbreeding according to the page on Darwins children. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 
 
This was confusing because I know too much history of science. The Darwin family's fortune came from the porcelain business--both Charles and his wife Emma were descendants of the famous Wedgewood family. Having porcelain mentioned in the Meitner panel but not the Darwin panel threw me off. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 12:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: