Editing Talk:1640: Super Bowl Context

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Am I the only one who finds the last speech pattern weird? Saying "mammals like Payton" seems a little reminiscent of comics [[1541]] and [[1530]]... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.140|162.158.2.140]] 13:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
Am I the only one who finds the last speech pattern weird? Saying "mammals like Payton" seems a little reminiscent of comics [[1541]] and [[1530]]... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.140|162.158.2.140]] 13:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
: Don't think so, there is no body snatching involved -- he is simply trying to connect whitehat's statement with some trivia; Mainnings is a human, humans are mammals, retirement is a recent human invention -- the statement is simply just hyper over loaded with irrelevant facts. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.109|162.158.255.109]] 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
+
 
:: Agree with that. Since we are all mamals and all mamals age, many of them via the same processes there is nothing wrong with the statment, only with the timing. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
+
: Don't think so, there is no body snatching involved -- he is simply trying to connect whitehat's statement with some trivia; Maiinings is a human, humans are mammals, retirement is a recent human invention -- the statement is simply just hyper over loaded with irrelevant facts. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.109|162.158.255.109]] 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  
 
Ok, I'm just gonna come out and say it: Coldplay sucks. [[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.173|198.41.235.173]] 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
Ok, I'm just gonna come out and say it: Coldplay sucks. [[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.173|198.41.235.173]] 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
: Is this some pop culture reference I'm missing?  (I didn't watch the Super Bowl, so perhaps it's a reference to that?) [[Special:Contributions/199.27.130.246|199.27.130.246]] 19:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
+
 
:: Coldplay played in the Halftime show. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
  
 
The first paragraph at the moment is merely insulting nerds and not really explaining anything. (N.B.: would the "stereotypical Nerd" watch sports, at all?) --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.242.240|198.41.242.240]] 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
The first paragraph at the moment is merely insulting nerds and not really explaining anything. (N.B.: would the "stereotypical Nerd" watch sports, at all?) --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.242.240|198.41.242.240]] 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
: I wrote it.  I'm a nerd.  It is more a self-reflection than an insult. I think it explains everything. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.109|162.158.255.109]] 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
:: I'm also a nerd, but the generalization given (in the present/former comic explanation) is not a high-fidelity description of me.  However, since it's a humorous hyperbole, I'm letting it go with just a "citation needed" stamp.  :-)
 
:: But, hyperbole or not, I did not feel like the rest of it was generally accurate.  That is, not all nerds are (or act) the same.  The description given seems to match Cueball's depiction in this comic, but does not match "nerds" generally.  So I tried to soften it a little, while exercising restraint.  (It's the sort of generalization that is funny when it's the joke, but does not seem as appropriate in an ''explanation'' of the joke.)
 
:: To answer the first point, though, it's hard to define what a "stereotypical nerd" is.  If we choose it to be [[wikipedia:Sheldon_Cooper|Sheldon]] (of [[wikipedia:The_Big_Bang_Theory|TBBT]]), then you're right in assuming that a nerd would not be watching sports at all (and would need a reminder of [[1480|last year's Super Bowl comic]]).  However, there are many types of nerds.  If "nerd" means "someone with an extreme interest in a field" then "sports nerd" can be a synonym for what we called a "jock" back in school.
 
:: Also, for what it's worth, I work in the software industry, and an alarming (to me) number of engineers are quite interested in sports and sporting events.  They might otherwise be called nerds. YMMV. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.130.246|199.27.130.246]] 19:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
:::I have changed this completely. He is not a nerd. He just cannot focus on a normal conversation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 
:::: You are a nerd. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.109|162.158.255.109]] 23:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC){{Citation needed}}
 
:::::Well thanks, that must be one of the biggest compliments you can get on explain xkcd ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 
 
Does anyone else feel that the "maybe next year" line was intentional?  Teams that don't win the Super Bowl (or at least their fans) will use the line when their hopes for a ring have been lost.  This is particularly apparent in the case of Cleveland Browns fans, who sometimes use the line during pre-season games. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.47|108.162.218.47]] 18:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 
 
I wonder if the comic is making fun of this website? The explanations are sometimes (usually) over the top. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.166|108.162.218.166]] 00:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 
 
I think [[White Hat]] should be [[Black Hat]]. [[User:SilverMagpie|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie|talk]]) 17:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 
 
Anyone else think that Cueball’s struggling attempt to refrain from providing context led to the context eventually stated being more extreme than usual? Starting context with “mammals like Peyton” is going another few steps back than the other context provided (which said nothing about the Super Bowl viewership of mammals, for example). It seems like the context was building up within him, getting more extreme as he attempted to restrain it. [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 17:21, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: