Editing Talk:1680: Black Hole
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
IF the explanation of "Milkshake" being a coded message is correct, then I like how Melis plays with it. I always thought the more sexual way, Milkshake meaning shaking her milk bags. Sure, that brings boys to the yard.... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.151|141.101.104.151]] | IF the explanation of "Milkshake" being a coded message is correct, then I like how Melis plays with it. I always thought the more sexual way, Milkshake meaning shaking her milk bags. Sure, that brings boys to the yard.... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.151|141.101.104.151]] | ||
− | It seems like a black hole of that "volume" would mean the earth "falls" into *it*, not the other way around. | + | It seems like a black hole of that "volume" would mean the earth "falls" into *it*, not the other way around. |
: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nHBGFKLHZQ Kurzgesagt's video] illustrates how Earth would be destroyed (around two minutes in). Whichever object is considered at rest, "falling into" is sort of a euphemism for what would really happen. [[User:.42|.42]] ([[User talk:.42|talk]]) 18:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | : [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nHBGFKLHZQ Kurzgesagt's video] illustrates how Earth would be destroyed (around two minutes in). Whichever object is considered at rest, "falling into" is sort of a euphemism for what would really happen. [[User:.42|.42]] ([[User talk:.42|talk]]) 18:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
: The inconsistency is in portraying the black hole as a calm, benign object that can rest safely on a coffee table. In reality, it would do something unimaginably violent that would preclude a conversation near the room it's in. [[User:.42|.42]] ([[User talk:.42|talk]]) 18:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | : The inconsistency is in portraying the black hole as a calm, benign object that can rest safely on a coffee table. In reality, it would do something unimaginably violent that would preclude a conversation near the room it's in. [[User:.42|.42]] ([[User talk:.42|talk]]) 18:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | + | == Worst explanation ever == | |
I came here for an explanation and I have so many questions. | I came here for an explanation and I have so many questions. | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
:Why delete it? While it may not be an explanation, it is a perfectly valid pop-cultural reference and may indeed be the one used in the comic. [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 14:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | :Why delete it? While it may not be an explanation, it is a perfectly valid pop-cultural reference and may indeed be the one used in the comic. [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 14:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I think it is appropriate to delete it. It is a common enough phrase to simply be used without referencing anything. Stating that it was the author's intended reference is simply speculation.[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 14:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | :I think it is appropriate to delete it. It is a common enough phrase to simply be used without referencing anything. Stating that it was the author's intended reference is simply speculation.[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 14:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |