Difference between revisions of "Talk:1719: Superzoom"
(Comment) |
(Comment) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I understand cruising altitudes vary, but I've been able to see airplane reg numbers using a 6MP APS-C dslr at 200mm and post-shot image review zoom. Has anyone done resolution math to fact check the assertion? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.87|108.162.221.87]] 23:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC) | I understand cruising altitudes vary, but I've been able to see airplane reg numbers using a 6MP APS-C dslr at 200mm and post-shot image review zoom. Has anyone done resolution math to fact check the assertion? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.87|108.162.221.87]] 23:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Editing this comment to add: And the title text - note the stain shirt is after the click comment. Really sounds like zooming into the image - which at a high resolution, shows a lot. |
Revision as of 23:11, 12 August 2016
Camera guy is an asshole. 108.162.216.76 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Didn't realise donkeys could fit in a guy!
Anyhow, does anyone know if those cameras are really that good? 108.162.219.69 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Alternatively, its possible he's borrowing this camera from beret guy. Too bad he didn't check to see if it dispenses soup; now we'll never know. 172.68.35.81 15:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I don't think the comic mentioned anything about the price of the camera. 108.162.215.116 16:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, he does; see the first panel. But I had to look twice after reading your comment. :) 108.162.215.207 16:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I think this comic might be inspired by this video I recently saw [1] --Eluvatar (talk) 17:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Here's a video of the Nikon P900 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-0X3xJf-kg which has 166x optical zoom 108.162.246.111 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
This feels like something Buttercup Festival would think up of. 173.245.54.44 19:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I understand cruising altitudes vary, but I've been able to see airplane reg numbers using a 6MP APS-C dslr at 200mm and post-shot image review zoom. Has anyone done resolution math to fact check the assertion? 108.162.221.87 23:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Editing this comment to add: And the title text - note the stain shirt is after the click comment. Really sounds like zooming into the image - which at a high resolution, shows a lot.