Editing Talk:1887: Two Down, One to Go

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Aurora viewing in "perhaps parts of Maine"? Maine's northern limit is ~47.5 degrees. Most of the US/Canada border is at 49 degrees, which is still too far south for good aurora views, but being in Seattle gets you closer to the pole than Maine. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.160|108.162.216.160]] 18:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 
Aurora viewing in "perhaps parts of Maine"? Maine's northern limit is ~47.5 degrees. Most of the US/Canada border is at 49 degrees, which is still too far south for good aurora views, but being in Seattle gets you closer to the pole than Maine. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.160|108.162.216.160]] 18:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
: Auroras are centered on the Earth's geomagnetic poles, not the geographic poles.  The geomagnetic pole is currently on Ellesmere Island and is closer to Portland, ME than Seattle, WA.  The closest spot in the contiguous US to the geomagnetic north pole might be in northern Maine, Isle Royale, MI or the Northwest angle, depending on exactly which epoch is used for the location of the pole.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.159|162.158.62.159]] 00:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
+
: Auroras are centered on the Earth's geomagnetic poles, not the geographic poles.  The geomagnetic pole is currently on Ellesmere Island and is closer to Portland, MA than Seattle, WA.  The closest spot in the contiguous US to the geomagnetic north pole is either in northern Maine or near the Northwest angle, depending on exactly which epoch is used for the location of the pole.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.159|162.158.62.159]] 00:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  
 
Could Randal's mention of a supernova be interpreted to mean that our sun goes supernova and since that's the last thing he sees, he jsut closes off his bucket list? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.58|108.162.221.58]] 22:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 
Could Randal's mention of a supernova be interpreted to mean that our sun goes supernova and since that's the last thing he sees, he jsut closes off his bucket list? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.58|108.162.221.58]] 22:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
:Nice idea, and fits with Randall's sense of humor, but he knows that while it is possible that a nearby star will go supernova in his lifetime (though unlikely) our sun will never go supernova because it is too small.  And the odds of our sun going nova anytime soon are meaningfully zero (on the same order of magnitude of the odds that every atom that makes up the clothing you are wearing suddenly quantum tunneling two feet to your left). [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.124|162.158.78.124]] 14:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 
 
I always have to share my favorite song about Romance and Science: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V_g_QxzUco Judith Edelman: Magnetic]. Read the lyrics at one of the first comments, "...Will the aurora borealis give us one last show?". --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 
 
Total Solar Eclipse: (16 times) check, Aurora (both northern and southern) check, Meteor Storm (1966) check, Naked eye visible supernova (SN 1987A) check, Transit of Venus: (2004 & 2012) check, Comet impact into a planet (Jupiter) check, Volcanic eruption (Mt. St. Helens, Kilauea, Mt. Erebus, etc.) check, Tsunami (Marshall Islands) check, Major Earthquake (Turkey, China, US) check, Hurricane (US, Virgin Islands, etc.) check, Tornado (several close up on the state of NM) check, Earth Poles, (North Geographic  Pole, South Geographic Pole. North Magnetic, South Magnetic) check, World records (1980 and 1990 record book) check,  .. still hoping to go into outer space, still hoping to see a naked eye Supernova in our galaxy, plus and a few other cool things: nevertheless, I'm well satisfied with my life so far.  [[User:Chongo|Chongo]] ([[User talk:Chongo|talk]]) 09:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 
 
FYI: There was no total solar eclipse in 2014, 2011, 2007, 2005, 2004, ... [[User:Chongo|Chongo]] ([[User talk:Chongo|talk]]) 09:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 
 
I'm not the only one who can see 'Wave of Hurricanes' right? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.83|108.162.238.83]] 12:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 
:Someone changed the image on this site. xkcd.com still shows the original with "Meteor Storm". If I knew how to fix this, I would. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.95|108.162.238.95]]
 
::It's corrected back to the original. But you must be patient to see it until the cache on the website is expired.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 14:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 14:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 
:::Someone has broken it again [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.18|172.68.65.18]] 15:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 
::::No, and the cache on the server has expired. Press F5 and you will see the correct picture. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 
 
There was a meteor storm [https://www.space.com/38225-comet-siding-spring-mars-meteor-shower.html back in 2014] that peaked at over 100,000 meteors per hour.  It's a shame we were on the wrong planet.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.106|108.162.210.106]] 21:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 
 
https://www.cnet.com/news/supernova-iptf13dqy-spotted-hours-after-star-explosion-nature-physics/[[Special:Contributions/172.69.62.184|172.69.62.184]] 01:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 
 
Spam by X. K. C. D.? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.131.106|172.70.131.106]] 22:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 
 
The reason why I added "{{Actual citation needed}}" to the figure: Remember that it is currently not unproven that light could travel instantaneously in one direction and half as fast in the other direction. The speed of light is in actuality just an average between the two outliers in speed. I also said this (exactly, word for word) in my edit summary. [[User:SilverTheTerribleMathematician|SilverTheTerribleMathematician]] ([[User talk:SilverTheTerribleMathematician|talk]]) 02:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: