Talk:2047: Beverages

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 11:17, 17 September 2018 by (talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

Randall Munroe needs to be less existential ... oh wait. (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2018‎ (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

Wouldn’t it warrant being freaked out *more* if it were shaped like lungs? Now that would freak me out. (Choking on food is but one example that even nature can not get a dual function, single endpoint API perfectly right. Luckily nature was unaware of GraphQL - or we’d have one orifice, 1 endpoint for all bodily functions. (talk) 05:36, 17 September 2018‎ (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

(Responding to the above unsigned) Aren’t there some animals where that is the case? Jellyfish and starfish (I think) are the examples that comes to mind, but I’m sure there are others (especially among sea life). Also wow, humanity (at least the English speaking portion) really likes naming things that aren’t fish “fish” 😂 PotatoGod (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Well you can think yourself lucky that you are not designed like a flatworm which only has one opening to its digestive cavity... 11:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Isn't the stream of beverages interrupted in intervals by swallowing? Sebastian -- 06:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

i think what he means with "if i wait a while" the Beverage at the end of digestion is then connected to the toilet, sewers and oceans...