Difference between revisions of "Talk:2585: Rounding"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Wot no {{w|FFF system|furlongs per fortnight}}? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.126|172.70.91.126]] 23:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | Wot no {{w|FFF system|furlongs per fortnight}}? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.126|172.70.91.126]] 23:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If we're using the table, can I suggest it be fully filled in, but mark "original (rounded)" value cells one key colour and the chosen conversion in another, so that scanning along (not necessarily adjacent/rightwards) then down (always next row) then along... you see the 'bounce around'. And we also get to appreciate what other fractional values ''could'' have been chosen, prior to rounding... Alternately, some flow-charty layout (perhaps contained within a nominally borderless version of the table?) with arrows leading across the width and filling in-between each down-step. Ideas only (I have others, but those seem the best betsto consider). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.113|172.70.85.113]] 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:32, 24 February 2022
Wot no furlongs per fortnight? 172.70.91.126 23:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
If we're using the table, can I suggest it be fully filled in, but mark "original (rounded)" value cells one key colour and the chosen conversion in another, so that scanning along (not necessarily adjacent/rightwards) then down (always next row) then along... you see the 'bounce around'. And we also get to appreciate what other fractional values could have been chosen, prior to rounding... Alternately, some flow-charty layout (perhaps contained within a nominally borderless version of the table?) with arrows leading across the width and filling in-between each down-step. Ideas only (I have others, but those seem the best betsto consider). 172.70.85.113 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
