Editing Talk:259: Clichéd Exchanges

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
 
The double entendre in this case is O RLY ~ orally? [[User:Undee|Undee]] ([[User talk:Undee|talk]]) 11:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 
The double entendre in this case is O RLY ~ orally? [[User:Undee|Undee]] ([[User talk:Undee|talk]]) 11:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
  
I never thought of it as a double entendre- I thought it was a play on words of Irish names,(as evidenced by the ommision of the first letter in some words) i.e. O'reilly. In this case, it would be "O'reilly? I 'ardly know 'er!" {{unsigned ip|108.162.221.243}}
+
I never thought of it as a double entendre- I thought it was a play on words of Irish names,(as evidenced by the ommision of the first letter in some words) i.e. O'reilly. In this case, it would be "O'reilly? I 'ardly know 'er!"
 
 
The fact that this is a collaborative wiki doesn't not mean you should put in every ludicrous and idiosyncratic interpretation that has special meaning to you and clearly has nothing to do with what Randall, or people in the rest of the world, understood the comic to be.  O RLY is not a reference to an Irish name, or a Hebrew name, or anything at all other than the eminently popular O RLY meme.  Period.  Leave your personal nonsense out of this wiki. {{unsigned ip|108.162.214.143}}
 
 
 
Since I am another that first thought of the Irish name and not a meme I have never heard of perhaps you should be the one to keep your personal nonsense out of this wiki. I have read most of the explains on this site and you are the first that I have seen that has targeted any single person for an attack like this. Also learn to sign wiki comments  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.231|162.158.62.231]] 12:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 
 
 
Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean no-one else has. I hadn't come across the subject meme, but I didn't assume that it was an appalling misspelling of O'Reilly. In addition, the person you're defending also hasn't learnt how to sign off Wiki-article comments, so it might be helpful if you were slightly less inconsistent with which parts of an argument you use. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.231|162.158.62.231]] 19:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 
 
 
I'm having trouble viewing this article. Redirect from 259 works, but direct URL gives out "No input file specified.". 15:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 
 
 
As of March 11, 2024, an issue occurs with the title text and after the word "with" it displays "clich$eacute;s." Possibly, an error with the code displaying the acute above the e. Is this a bug on my end (chrome) or is it an issue with the comic itself, and should I add it to the trivia? {{unsigned ip|204.113.154.25}} 18:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 
:Indeed, checking myself (on several browsers, just in case it ''was'' differently served according to the agent requesting), I found that it was because it was <code>title="It&amp;<!-- nowiki tag doesn't  properly disable character references, apparently, so forcing additional ampersand encoding all over here, for strictly illustrative purposesñ-->#39;s like they say, you gotta fight fire with clich&amp;amp;eacute;s."</code>. What should have been <code>&amp;eacute;</code>, to give an "&eacute;", was doubly-escaped to "ampersand the ampersand". (Incidentally, googling "xkcd 259" gives the result's page/link title (for the xkcd match, but not explainxkcd) as "Clichd", so clearly Google just decided to junk the funny characted in the title-tag of the page/whatever it uses.)
 
:I suppose we ought to check if other (previously properly given) title texts with simple ampersanding have ''also'' become double-ampersanded. This might reveal an improper export/transfer from one system to another (like you used to see with things like jobsite reaggregators, "Salary: &amp;amp;amp;pound;30,000 p/a", often ironicly for positions like website roles...). But I suspect that it's entirely unintentional and unwanted. And is quite easy to fix, if that's what happened, so maybe Randall just needs a nudge to de-escape (by one level) any affected things in his backend database. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.182|172.69.194.182]] 02:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 
:...checked around. Disappointingly, nothing that has the same 'accidentally re-encodable" structure. Of the ones with (non-apostrophe, non-quote) 'extended characters', I've only seen them appearing straight. Like [[2606: Weird Unicode Math Symbols]] having its way-off-ASCII character as literal, totally unencoded! Maybe someone else can find another similar treatment, though. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.157|172.71.178.157]] 02:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: