Editing Talk:2787: Iceberg
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Simulations are pretty clear about this: most of the inhibitory connections in the brain are effectively used to keep the excitatory connections at a state of maximum sensitivity to input signals. (Without them, you'd have a runaway cascade; a seizure.) No, it's obvious that not everything is used at once because we're not actively remembering everything at once; there must be ''something'' quiescent most of the time. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.21|162.158.34.21]] 14:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) | ::Simulations are pretty clear about this: most of the inhibitory connections in the brain are effectively used to keep the excitatory connections at a state of maximum sensitivity to input signals. (Without them, you'd have a runaway cascade; a seizure.) No, it's obvious that not everything is used at once because we're not actively remembering everything at once; there must be ''something'' quiescent most of the time. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.21|162.158.34.21]] 14:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: Not so, it could be the case that information is constantly moving throughout the brain and our perception of thought is when those neurons pause or rest or else when it moves even faster. We know that this is not how the brain functions, it's just a counterexample to the above comment. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.73|108.162.242.73]] 13:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC) | ::: Not so, it could be the case that information is constantly moving throughout the brain and our perception of thought is when those neurons pause or rest or else when it moves even faster. We know that this is not how the brain functions, it's just a counterexample to the above comment. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.73|108.162.242.73]] 13:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
Also, how does dark matter produce buoyancy if it doesn't interact with water? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.247.50|172.69.247.50]] 15:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC) | Also, how does dark matter produce buoyancy if it doesn't interact with water? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.247.50|172.69.247.50]] 15:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Perhaps it's floating in "dark matter water" (smirk) [[User:Mrob27|Mrob27]] ([[User talk:Mrob27|talk]]) 19:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC) | : Perhaps it's floating in "dark matter water" (smirk) [[User:Mrob27|Mrob27]] ([[User talk:Mrob27|talk]]) 19:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Below the surface of the water, sunlight has trouble penetrating. So clearly, the deepest parts of the oceans are dark matter. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.183|162.158.2.183]] 02:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC) | :: Below the surface of the water, sunlight has trouble penetrating. So clearly, the deepest parts of the oceans are dark matter. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.183|162.158.2.183]] 02:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
Should a note be added emphasis this was published June 9th, not to be confused with the following June 16th when the Oceangate sub sets off? Maybe this talking point is enough? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.54|172.70.178.54]] 18:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC) | Should a note be added emphasis this was published June 9th, not to be confused with the following June 16th when the Oceangate sub sets off? Maybe this talking point is enough? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.54|172.70.178.54]] 18:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC) |