Editing Talk:2897: Light Leap Years
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I find it funny (assuming we're seeing the last edit to have been done, and Cueball's not just scrolled us up to see the very first 'diff' again) that the whole month-and-a-lot-long job has apparently ''finished'' with the changed measurement for the likely closest object in the database of thousands (or maybe even "''m''illions and ''b''illions!") of cosmological objects. Whether or not it has extragalactic (or significantly transgalactic) record items in it, it would seem rather topsy-turvy to leave the physically nearest item's entry until last, if it was indeed consciously sorted by any distance-related parameter. (Like I could understand if it were perhaps something like {{w|Zeta Reticuli}}, where we ended up, more than {{w|Alpha Cassiopeiae}}, or maybe [https://www.universeguide.com/star/95163/zvulpeculae Z Vul] at the opposite end to {{w|Alpheratz|'Alpha And'}}.) ...ok, so maybe now I'm just [https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/440683-explaining-a-joke-is-like-dissecting-a-frog-you-understand dissecting] the <s>frog</s> [https://www.astronomy.com/observing/binocular-universe-bring-back-bufo/ toad], but I still think it's yet another 'layer of funny'. Whether intended (I really wouldn't put it past Randall being so deep...) or otherwise! [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.185|172.71.178.185]] 03:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC) | I find it funny (assuming we're seeing the last edit to have been done, and Cueball's not just scrolled us up to see the very first 'diff' again) that the whole month-and-a-lot-long job has apparently ''finished'' with the changed measurement for the likely closest object in the database of thousands (or maybe even "''m''illions and ''b''illions!") of cosmological objects. Whether or not it has extragalactic (or significantly transgalactic) record items in it, it would seem rather topsy-turvy to leave the physically nearest item's entry until last, if it was indeed consciously sorted by any distance-related parameter. (Like I could understand if it were perhaps something like {{w|Zeta Reticuli}}, where we ended up, more than {{w|Alpha Cassiopeiae}}, or maybe [https://www.universeguide.com/star/95163/zvulpeculae Z Vul] at the opposite end to {{w|Alpheratz|'Alpha And'}}.) ...ok, so maybe now I'm just [https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/440683-explaining-a-joke-is-like-dissecting-a-frog-you-understand dissecting] the <s>frog</s> [https://www.astronomy.com/observing/binocular-universe-bring-back-bufo/ toad], but I still think it's yet another 'layer of funny'. Whether intended (I really wouldn't put it past Randall being so deep...) or otherwise! [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.185|172.71.178.185]] 03:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
β | |||
β |