|
Please sign your posts with ~~~~
|
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | | | |
| | Would this behaviour constitute as sexual harassment? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 03:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC) | | Would this behaviour constitute as sexual harassment? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 03:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
| β | :If you did it to random individuals, with no prior context. But situationally, though I wouldn't want to speak on behalf of this particular partnership, I wouldn't at all leap to assuming it was an ''un''wanted gesture.
| |
| β | :We only really get Randall's POV of his/Cueball's relationship with the respective 'Megan', but hard to imagine we'd be amongst the first to even get hints to the contrary, this way. (Of all the couples one might know, hardly ''our'' prime concern. Trust to those who'd know better. If you need to, keep your eye on 'iffy' relationships amongst those you actually know from more than electronic pen-and-ink, where you can perhaps make a more positive difference if necessary.)
| |
| β | :Good to know you're aware of such possible problems, in society, but a bit of a leap of imagination to leap to an unbiden defence of someone's unknown feelings. (In a possibly entirely fictional episode, at that.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.210|141.101.99.210]] 10:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
