Editing Talk:748: Worst-Case Scenario
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The original {{w|Campaign for "santorum" neologism|"frothy mix"}} incident occurred in 2003 and came back into the news during Rick Santorum's Presidential primary campaign in 2013. So frothy mix could still be a reference to that incident. [[User:Dawfedora|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora|talk]]) 21:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) | The original {{w|Campaign for "santorum" neologism|"frothy mix"}} incident occurred in 2003 and came back into the news during Rick Santorum's Presidential primary campaign in 2013. So frothy mix could still be a reference to that incident. [[User:Dawfedora|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora|talk]]) 21:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
β | |||
Isn't this tantamount to blackmail: "In 2010 Savage said he would take the site down if Santorum donated US$5 million plus interest to Freedom to Marry"? {{unsigned|Weatherlawyer}} | Isn't this tantamount to blackmail: "In 2010 Savage said he would take the site down if Santorum donated US$5 million plus interest to Freedom to Marry"? {{unsigned|Weatherlawyer}} |