Editing Talk:85: Paths

This is the kind of thing that comes up in story problems in Calculus often.   If you can travel in/over one medium at one speed, and in/over another medium at a different speed, what is the optimum path to minimize your travel time.<br>
An example of this problem would be if there is a drowning swimmer 100 meters offshore, you are 300 meters from the point on the shoreline closest to the swimmer, and you can run at 15mph and swim at 2mph, how far do you run along the shoreline before going into the water to get to the swimmer as quickly as possible?<br>
The fact that Randall shows two different paths over the "grass" makes me think that he was thinking more along the line of obsessively optimizing his path rather than about whether it might be acceptable or not to walk over the grass. -- mwburden [[Special:Contributions/70.91.188.49|70.91.188.49]] 21:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Along similar lines, [http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97628&page=1 this mathematician's dog] uses Calculus (albeit at an intuitive, rather than mathematical level) to optimize the path that it takes to retrieve the ball from the water. -- mwburden [[Special:Contributions/70.91.188.49|70.91.188.49]] 21:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

This particular situation is less interesting, since the walker's speed is the same for all three paths!  This is seen by the times being directly proportional to the distances.  Normally, the off-normal-path is at a lower speed, but some shorter path still gives the smallest time.DrMath 08:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Where do the equations come from to figure out #2 & #3 - can anybody derive it? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.185}}
:The equation #2 comes from the second route. t(1+√2)/3 is how far the second path takes the guy. If each block is a unit square, the diagonal to the corner is √2 while the next part is 1. The t/3 part is making it comparable to the first one (the first one is t despite it being 3 unit squares). Equation #3 is t√(5)/3. Plugging 1, 2, and √5 into wolfram|alpha for triangle side lengths makes it a right triange, so the √5 comes from the side length (assuming unit squares) while the t/3 makes it comparable to the first one.[[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 02:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
::I added the equations to the explanation. Should they be a little more in-depth? I was worried about cluttering up the page, but I'm also worried that some people would want a fuller derivation. [[User:DownGoer|DownGoer]] ([[User talk:DownGoer|talk]]) 03:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Interestingly enough, if the three sides are equal in time taken (20 seconds each), the time it would take for path #2 would be 20rt2 + 20, and path three would be roughly 40, which comes out to 60, 48.28, and 40 seconds by using very simple geometry. {{unsigned ip|108.162.237.179}}
:Based on his times, it is two squares with the same side length. Base on that geometry, Path #2 will be the hypotenuse of a 45 degree right triangle. t = √(20^2 + 20^2) = 20 * √2 = 48.28. Path #3 would be t = √(20^2 + 40^2) = 20 * √5 = 44.72. Not sure where you got roughly 40 from. Were you thinking of the sin of 30 degree rule where the hypotenuse is double the opposite side? In this case, the adjacent is double the opposite which puts the hypotenuse at √5 times the opposite.[[User:Flewk|Flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 17:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be added to Time management category?
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 :Based on his times, it is two squares with the same side length. Base on that geometry, Path #2 will be the hypotenuse of a 45 degree right triangle. t = √(20^2 + 20^2) = 20 * √2 = 48.28. Path #3 would be t = √(20^2 + 40^2) = 20 * √5 = 44.72. Not sure where you got roughly 40 from. Were you thinking of the sin of 30 degree rule where the hypotenuse is double the opposite side? In this case, the adjacent is double the opposite which puts the hypotenuse at √5 times the opposite.[[User:Flewk|Flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 17:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
-Shouldn't this be added to Time management category? {{subst:Unsigned IP|172.68.62.4}}
+Shouldn't this be added to Time management category?
-What the hell, no unsigned templates here?
-Anyway, I'm wondering why there's any worry. Couldn't he just cut across the grass diagonally? Sidewalk-conformist. — [[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 22:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)