Editing Talk:866: Compass and Straightedge

No, the comic is funny because many geometrical theorems prove something along the lines of "With a compass and straightedge you cannot construct..." (e.g. a square and a circle with the same area) If you have knowledge of this type of proof, the humor is that you think he's about to talk about something that is impossible in geometry, but really he's talking about the inapplicability of geometry to real life. This is often a difficulty with nerds and brainy people, they try to apply their theoretical knowledge to human relationships and fail. [[Special:Contributions/75.103.23.206|75.103.23.206]] 19:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
:And then there's the converse: people who are able to apply theoretical knowledge and succeed. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87|76.106.251.87]] 04:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The explanation mentions that there are "three such constructions", but doesn't go any further.  What they are should at least be addressed (or linked to), even if we're not going to elaborate on the "why" of their impossibility.  For the uninitiated, they are squaring the circle, trisecting any angle, and doubling the cube. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87|76.106.251.87]] 04:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

If such constructions are "impossible with the use of modern algebraic techniques," then why don't we just use older algebraic techniques?  ;){{unsigned ip|213.203.138.251}}
:Those "modern algebraic techniques" just did prove that you can't solve this constructions by using only "classical geometry".--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 18:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I tried forming a club for compasses and straight edges but no one signed up :( ~JFreund

Could the “most awsome birthday party“ bear another deeper meaning, for example be analogue to the rational polynom with rational coefficients?
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.202.100|162.158.202.100]] 04:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Could this "most awesome birthday party" be a reference to Stephen Hawking's party for time travelers?
[[User:Spagovir|Spagovir]] ([[User talk:Spagovir|talk]]) 18:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
: I'm pretty sure you're right, it sounds like a Hawking party reference to me too. - [[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]] ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|talk]]) 06:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Anyone think of adding a reference to 710 Collatz Conjecture?  Where in a similar vein, he begins by explaining the steps for applying the conjecture, then finishes up by losing all his friends.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.17|108.162.246.17]] 16:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

There's some irony in the fact that Randall *could* give Cueball friends using only a compass and a straight edge, since Cueball himself can be drawn using only a compass (for the round head) and straight edge (stick figure).