Editing Talk:91: Pwned
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The computers mentioned (IBM-XT, Atari, or C64) are too new. Zork was originally written for a DEC PDP-10 and ported to several other text-only computers. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 14:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | The computers mentioned (IBM-XT, Atari, or C64) are too new. Zork was originally written for a DEC PDP-10 and ported to several other text-only computers. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 14:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Those computers certainly are not too new. I played Zork and many other Infocom text adventures on my Commodore 64, and I'm sure far more people played them on the C-64 and the IBM-XT than could have possibly played them on the DEC PDP-10 mainframe. A big part of the success of the Infocom text adventures is that they could be ported to everything that could run them at the time, and so they were.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.98.37|172.70.98.37]] 01:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC) | ::Those computers certainly are not too new. I played Zork and many other Infocom text adventures on my Commodore 64, and I'm sure far more people played them on the C-64 and the IBM-XT than could have possibly played them on the DEC PDP-10 mainframe. A big part of the success of the Infocom text adventures is that they could be ported to everything that could run them at the time, and so they were.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.98.37|172.70.98.37]] 01:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |