Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | |
| No, but live scorpions are: http://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c5_007.htm --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.205|173.245.52.205]] 15:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC) | | No, but live scorpions are: http://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c5_007.htm --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.205|173.245.52.205]] 15:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
− | :526.5 explains when they're allowed and how to mail them: https://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c5_008.htm#ep184083 [[User:Solomon|Solomon]] ([[User talk:Solomon|talk]]) 06:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| I think it's black hat guy on the other end of the phone line. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.45|108.162.221.45]] 20:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC) | | I think it's black hat guy on the other end of the phone line. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.45|108.162.221.45]] 20:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
| | | |
− | : If it were the black hat guy, he'd have something more snarky to say. This cueball's character is more in line with beret guy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.39|108.162.216.39]] 07:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)BK201 | + | : If it were the black hat guy, he'd have something more snarky to say. This cue ball's character is more in line with beret guy. |
− | | + | [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.39|108.162.216.39]] 07:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)BK201 |
− | :: Black hat does have an obsession about these things. see 325. This seems to be likely that it's him. But ill leave the desicion to someone else. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.139|162.158.2.139]] 05:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| Did anyone else read it as him not being allowed to mail himself via USPS? --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | | Did anyone else read it as him not being allowed to mail himself via USPS? --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC) |
− |
| |
− | A package of time, if it even made sense, would not require time not to be continuous. However I won't remove that paragraph from the explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.41|172.68.26.41]] 19:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | The second paragraph here is rather unclear and could use some rewriting. Unfortunately, I can't get a good enough grasp of what it's trying to say to do it.
| |
− | * The first sentence I think is trying to say something like "...time is not continuous - similar to particles in quantum mechanics", but I don't know enough about the subject to know if this makes sense.
| |
− | * The first part of the second sentence looks like it's trying to say "This is not a widely accepted theory..."
| |
− | * I don't know what the second part of the second sentence is getting at at all
| |
− | Can anyone else have a go at it?[[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.16|141.101.76.16]] 12:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | isn't pi either close to a number with a fixed number of decimals (as before the revision by M), or equal to a number with indefinite decimals (as indicated by the "...")? So that the combination of close to and the "..." makes it at least inaccurate? As I am not 100% familiar with English mathematical writing: Can someone please verify or contradict my statement? --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 15:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
| |
− | :You can define a rational number that is arbitrarily close to pi (example: off by no more than 1 in 10 to the tenth power). You can never write down (or digitally store) the '''exact''' value of pi. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 03:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | It could also be a literal no fly list, as in the insect fly. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.141|172.68.110.141]] 12:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
| |