Difference between revisions of "Template talk:comic discussion"
(Undo revision 11304 by 91.207.8.246 (talk): destructive changes) |
(→New topic for testing purposes: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 22:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC) | :[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 22:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == New topic for testing purposes == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just testing what the TOC looks like... [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:01, 14 April 2013
The template eats whitespace, compare Talk:1101: Sketchiness and 1101: Sketchiness. --Kronf (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. In most cases it performs fine. Here's just a few examples:
- 1094: Interview vs. Talk:1094: Interview
- 1093: Forget vs. Talk:1093: Forget
- 1092: Michael Phelps vs. Talk:1092: Michael Phelps (last 2 comments)
- 1091: Curiosity vs. Talk:1091: Curiosity (at least the first 2 comments)
- 1090: Formal Languages vs. Talk:1090: Formal Languages
- etc.
- I don't know what is wrong with that talk page, but it appears to be happening only for that comic.
New topic for testing purposes
Just testing what the TOC looks like... Mark Hurd (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
