354: Startling

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
We actually reached the future about three years ago.
Title text: We actually reached the future about three years ago.

[edit] Explanation

Cueball is startled every few month when he, again, realizes that he now lives in the 21. century. When he grew up as a child the 2000s seemed very far away — it was the future, but he now exists in that timeframe with the rest of society.

The title text states that "the future" was reached in 2004 — three years before the comic was published. This is possibly a joke on how time works, as "the future" is always, was always, and will always be ahead of the time you're at. There may, however, be a reference to some movie set in the future year 2004...

The 20th century, even the year 2004 was futuristic for people growing up in, for instance, the eighties. This view just belongs to the perspective of people — for people growing up in the 70s the novel 1984 was even futuristic.

[edit] Transcript

[Cueball sits silently front of his computer.]
I still do this every few months.
[He continues to sit for two more panels.]
Cueball: Holy crap, it's the 21st century.
comment.png add a comment!


This comic isn't that simple:

  • what is Cueball doing every few months?
  • is 2004 correct? If yes, what does it mean?

--Dgbrt (talk) 20:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Every few months, Cueball halts his work and realizes that he is in the twenty-first century. Someone who grew up in anticipation of the new millennium (and the new century along with it) may take quite a while to adjust to it. The second bullet point, however, requires some research. --Quicksilver (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

"in which he lives in" – this is redundant. It should be "in which he lives. This could be a reference to the song "Live and Let Die", but unless this reference is more clearly explained, it does not belong in the explanation. (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

I would expand on this thought and state it should be altered to "in about the time in which he lives in is living in" just to clarify specifically that it's that specific time in which he specifically lives in generally. Thokling (talk) 15:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
I don't think the future is specifically 2004. It is unthinkable to Cueball (and hence Randall) that we are even in the twenty-first century. For him, the 21st century was "the future," a whole new millennium. I think the point of the title text isn't that the future occurred in 2004, its that we're living in "the future." 01:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools


It seems you are using noscript, which is stopping our project wonderful ads from working. Explain xkcd uses ads to pay for bandwidth, and we manually approve all our advertisers, and our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs. If you found this site helpful, please consider whitelisting us.

Want to advertise with us, or donate to us with Paypal or Bitcoin?