Difference between revisions of "Talk:793: Physicists"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Lol accurate [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | : Lol accurate [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, etcetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion. | ::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, etcetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion. | ||
+ | ::: I read the above statement in Raj's voice because of the original comment. Not sure why Raj. | ||
[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:28, 2 May 2017
And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born... -- 108.28.72.186 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Oh great, now I can't help but read the title text in his voice. 162.158.2.62 22:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Lol accurate 108.162.219.223 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, etcetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
- I read the above statement in Raj's voice because of the original comment. Not sure why Raj.
- Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, etcetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)