Difference between revisions of "1017: Backward in Time"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Explanation: were=>where (could do with some punctuation, or even links))
Line 37: Line 37:
 
| 30% || 1997 || N/A || ...
 
| 30% || 1997 || N/A || ...
 
|-
 
|-
| 31.12% || February 1995 ||  Windows 95 Debuts, OJ Found Not Guilty|| The OJ Simson trial was a famous trial were OJ was tried for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.
+
| 31.12% || February 1995 ||  Windows 95 Debuts, OJ Found Not Guilty|| The OJ Simson trial was a famous trial where OJ was tried for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 40% || 1958 || N/A || ...
 
| 40% || 1958 || N/A || ...

Revision as of 16:27, 3 April 2024

Backward in Time
People tell me I have too much time on my hands, but really the problem is that there's too much time, PERIOD.
Title text: People tell me I have too much time on my hands, but really the problem is that there's too much time, PERIOD.

Clicking the image at xkcd.com links to this spreadsheet, which Randall used to calculate the times and dates for the comic. It also has a lot of other percentages and dates, so take a look if you are interested.

Explanation

Cueball/Randall creates this formula which helps him wait for long stretches of time which goes increasingly faster into the past as more time goes by, which gives him the effect of looking like the time goes by quickly. Which assists in the waiting process.

As far as the actual math is concerned, the formula is an exponential function (i.e. the variable appears in the exponent). The effect that the function grows faster and faster as p grows, is due to T(p) being exponential. More precisely, when you repeatedly add some constant to the exponent, you will repeatedly multiply some (other) constant with the value of the function. Compare how "slow" a value grows by adding even high values (1, 1001, 2001, 3001, 4001, 5001…) and how fast it grows by multiplying even low values (1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000…)

Now, the function has to be adjusted so that, as Randall put it, "the time spent in each part of the past is loosely proportional to how well I know it." The most important adjustment is putting p to the power of three. That lowers the amount added to the exponent for low values (0.1³=0.001, 0.2³=0.008, i.e. only 7/1000 have been added for 10% workflow) and increases the amount for high values (0.8³=0.512, 0.9³=0.729, i.e. more than 1/5 has been added for 10% workflow). That means the recent past will pass even slower and the historic past even faster than it already does by choosing an exponential function. The remaining adjustments are technical. The coefficient in front of p³ adjusts the constant by which the result will be multiplied while adding some constant to p, while it also roughly ensures that p=1 yields the lifetime of the universe. The 3 added to the product in the exponent further adjusts the actual values of the power without touching the slope (the multiplicative constant). In the parentheses, e³ is subtracted to put the time to 0 when p=0. Otherwise the function would start approx. 20 yrs and 1 month ago. For bigger p, this offset does not matter much. Imagine subtracting 20 yrs from the lifetime of the universe!

Finally, the result is subtracted from the current date for aesthetical reasons. The formula could tell you "20 yrs ago", or it could read "February 1992". Randall decided the latter would be better.

There is actually a mathematical error in this comic; the inverse function in grey writing off at the bottom right of the main formula involves a square root, when the actual inverse of Randall's main function would involve a cube root. In addition, this function does not contain the current date, meaning that T, in the inverse, refers to how long ago a point in time was, rather than the point in time itself. When the T in the inverse is 20, it means that the date referenced by T is 20 years ago.

The punchline "Swoosh!" is about how fast the last few percents of Cueball's download happen in "such a rush". For most humans waiting for a download to complete tends to become really boring and progress would instead seem to get slower and slower.

Percent Amount of Time Ago Around This Time: Explanation of Time Period
0% Now (As of the comics writing this would have been Feburary 15 2012) N/A ...
7.308% December 18 2011 Kim Jong-il Dies, US Leaves Iraq ...
10% Sep. 2011 N/A This would be around the date of the tenth aniversary of the 9/11 Attacks. Randall also got married around this time.
20% 2008 N/A ...
30% 1997 N/A ...
31.12% February 1995 Windows 95 Debuts, OJ Found Not Guilty The OJ Simson trial was a famous trial where OJ was tried for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.
40% 1958 N/A ...
47.91% 1844 Rubber Vulcanized, Bicycle Invented, Wrench Patented ...
50% 1776 N/A ...
60% 405 AD N/A ...
70% 22,000 Years Ago N/A ...
70.33 24,Years Ago Caves Painted, Ceramic Art Made. Neanderthals Extict ...
80% 671,000 Years Ago N/A ...
90% 55 Million Years Ago N/A ...
90.42% 68 Million Years Ago First flowering plants. Chicxulub impact kills off most dinosaurs. ...
100% 13.76 billion years ago Universe begins. First stars ignite. ...

(Also, the workout website, Fitocracy has been mentioned previously in xkcd.)

Note that as of the time that this page was last cached, the comic was uploaded at 15.530136800977% progress.

Transcript

When I have a boring task to get through — a three-hour lecture, a giant file download, or a long term point goal in fitocracy — I use this formula to convert the percentage completed (p) into a date:
T=(Current Date) - (e^(20.3444*p^3+3) - e^3) years
When the task is 0% done, it gives today's date, and as I make progress, I move further and further back in time
(inverse given in lighter colors)
Inverse: p = sqrt((ln(T+e^3)-3)/20.3444)
[Line Graph explaining the correlation between completion percentages and temporal deltas.]
0% = now (Date of comic is 2012-02-14T00:00-0500, approx. 1329195600 UNIX)
10% = September 2011
20% = 2008
30% = 1997
40% = 1958
50% = 1776
60% = 405 AD
70% = 22,000 years ago
80% = 671,000 years ago
90% = 55 million years ago
100% = 13.8 billion years ago
It moves slowly through the first few years, then steadily accelerates. I tuned the formula so the time spent in each part of the past is loosely proportional to how well I know it. This means I hit familiar landmarks with each bit of progress, giving me a satisfying sense of movement.
[The following are panels detailing completion percentages, correlated time periods, and notable events from this time period.]
7.308% December 18, 2011
Around this time:
Kim Jong-Il dies. US leaves Iraq.
31.12% February 1995
Around this time:
Windows 95 debuts. OJ found not guilty.
47.91% 1844
Around this time:
Rubber vulcanized, bicycle invented, wrench patented.
70.33% 24,000 years ago
Around this time:
Caves painted, ceramic art made. Neanderthals extinct.
90.42% 68 million years ago
Around this time:
First flowering plants. Chicxulub impact kills off most dinosaurs.
100% 13.76 billion years ago
Around this time:
Universe begins. First stars ignite.
Download complete.
[Cueball watches a download progress on a laptop in amazement and happiness. Megan stands nearby and looks at Cueball with a bemused posture.]
Cueball: Swoosh! Watching all that time blur past is such a rush!
Megan: So...you've tried to make an extreme sport out of...waiting.
Cueball: Swoosh!


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

That spreadsheet is going to need updating in the future. Jimmy C (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

If you're running Excel, the formula is =SUM(EXP(20.3444*(B8^3)+3)-EXP(3)) BlueRoll18 (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I find it more aesthetically pleasing to have the time running forwards; starting with the big bang and ending in the present day. Which reminds me strongly of the introduction to the Big Bang Theory series. Popup (talk) 09:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure, but it looks like Randall acted up the inverse. It has no reference to the current date, and I am not sure, but I think it should be a cube root. 72.70.180.234 19:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

It does indeed reference the current date. Note the T in ln(T... --141.101.98.63 03:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

There's almost a meta-joke here in that all that figuring and calculating would certainly kill a lot of time. 108.162.238.65 14:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

This page is ruining my Wikipedia LOL, https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1051:_Visited Apollo11 (talk) 16:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

There's just being a lot added about Iraq. Not sure it's needed (it needed copyediting for various reasons). But, if it is, can we have a similar amount of explanation about Kim Jong-il, given that he is also mentioned in that row? 172.70.86.145 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes I was planning on adding a similar amount of info to all of them (see rubber vulcanization), I'm just doing about one topic per "session" and currently have zero reasearch help. Apollo11 (talk) 19:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)