834: Wikileaks

|< < Prev Comic #834  Next > >|

Wikileaks

Title text: STUDENTS ARE CALLING PRESIDENT JOHNSON EN MASSE TO PROTEST THE BOMBING AND IT'S JAMMED THE WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD. COULD THEY COLLAPSE OUR CRITICAL PHONE SYSTEMS? HAS THE FIRST TELEPHONE WAR BEGUN? STAY TUNED FOR MORE ON THIS DANGEROUS NEW TECHNOLOGY.

Explanation

This comic references WikiLeaks, a site that people with classified data can send to for the information to be posted publicly, while nobody would know who leaked the data. Many people dislike WikiLeaks, but proponents claim that, since government is supposed to work for the people, all government information should be available to anyone who wants to see it. At the same time, WikiLeaks' acts are illegal in most countries, and the people maintaining WikiLeaks stay anonymous, with the notable exception of Julian Assange the spokesperson. The comic shows WikiLeaks releasing all WikiLeaks' members' private information, thereby unmasking them to the world. This would be giving WikiLeaks a taste of its own medicine, because as much as they believe in freedom of information, they don't believe in freedom of that information.

Transcript

[A black formal suit with no head is talking.]

Suit: We are Anonymous.

We are legion.

We are no one

and everyone.

And we are here to fight for WikiLeaks.

[The panel is presented as the front page of WikiLeaks, in a browser.]

New Leak:

Names, addresses, IPs, and phone numbers of everyone in Anonymous.

Download Now

Suit: ... Dammit, Julian.

 add a comment! ⋅  add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅  refresh comments!

Discussion

The third paragraph sounds awkward to me, and I couldn't figure out anything to do about it. Could somebody fix that, please? Kyt (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Had a crack, not sure its any less awkward, but it is more balanced Plm-qaz snr (talk) 10:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

:This could be Randall's criticism of Wikileaks for betraying the United States Government. Such a criticism would imply that Wikileaks gains allies, but needs betrayal and secrets in order to continue working. Randall could be implying that Wikileaks can only survive by betraying its supporters, as total declassification of the Government would render them useless. Equally, it could be just for laffs or a reflection on the risks of allying with a dispassionate organisation with a single agenda that could be as readily used against you as against its current target of the government. 

I don't think it is a crack. The students making a nuisance of themselves in the Johnson era turned out to be heroic. Who denies that, these days?

ummm ...my australianism may have been confusing "Had a crack" was an abbreviation of "i had a crack at it" meaning "i have had a go at fixing the third paragraph". No reference to cracks in the content or fracturing generally Plm-qaz snr (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

It's a paradox though and a joke in what Wikileaks does (in the comic.) Currently Julian Assange is being "held hostage" by the British government over a Swedish case the Swedes have no interest in. The FBI (ostensibly) unmasked the culprits in Anonymous' DDoS of the US government. Wikileaks have never given identities away. Shoddy security has seen it hacked though.

Who knows what else went on with heartbleed and the like. It is a sack of shit all around.

I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 20:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I feel like we need an explanation for that IP address in the address bar. Incomplete? 108.162.218.35 14:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

    It is from japan from a quick search