Editing Talk:2365: Messaging Systems
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Aww, Telegram didn't even get mentioned, despite having 200 times as many users as Signal. :( [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 21:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC) | Aww, Telegram didn't even get mentioned, despite having 200 times as many users as Signal. :( [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 21:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Telegram is not really E2E encrypted by default. One-on-one conversations can be upgraded to E2E encryption ("secret chat") but group conversations not at all. -> [https://telegra.ph/Why-Isnt-Telegram-End-to-End-Encrypted-by-Default-08-14 From the horse's mouth]. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.164|141.101.98.164]] 20:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC) | :Telegram is not really E2E encrypted by default. One-on-one conversations can be upgraded to E2E encryption ("secret chat") but group conversations not at all. -> [https://telegra.ph/Why-Isnt-Telegram-End-to-End-Encrypted-by-Default-08-14 From the horse's mouth]. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.164|141.101.98.164]] 20:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
β | |||
I for one would support using Randall's local-mobile-TID-gateway protocol [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.157|173.245.52.157]] 22:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC) | I for one would support using Randall's local-mobile-TID-gateway protocol [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.157|173.245.52.157]] 22:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC) |