Difference between revisions of "Talk:459: Holy Ghost"
The Cat Lady (talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: It's not the Trinity that's the issue. It's that the Bible talks a whole lot about the Holy Spirit. He is very important to the theology. If He can be trapped, it means the Bible got a lot of things wrong. [[User:Trlkly|Trlkly]] ([[User talk:Trlkly|talk]]) 23:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | : It's not the Trinity that's the issue. It's that the Bible talks a whole lot about the Holy Spirit. He is very important to the theology. If He can be trapped, it means the Bible got a lot of things wrong. [[User:Trlkly|Trlkly]] ([[User talk:Trlkly|talk]]) 23:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
::Uh, the Bible got <i>everything</i> wrong, it's fiction... [[User:The Cat Lady|-- The Cat Lady]] ([[User talk:The Cat Lady|talk]]) 09:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC) | ::Uh, the Bible got <i>everything</i> wrong, it's fiction... [[User:The Cat Lady|-- The Cat Lady]] ([[User talk:The Cat Lady|talk]]) 09:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::No it didn't; Even if you don't believe it's the infallible word of God (it is), you still need to except it as a book with potentially unreliable historical accounts of things that actually happened | ||
[[User:Nk22|Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 11:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Woah | [[User:Nk22|Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 11:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Woah | ||
Why is the 2nd frame inverted? | Why is the 2nd frame inverted? |
Revision as of 19:13, 31 January 2024
Pope: Do you know how much scripture we'll have to revise?
It isn't a problem. Trinitarian dogma isn't even peripheral to scripture. So the answer is: "None". I am sure that had there been cause for concern at least one comedian would have come up with it by now.
I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's not the Trinity that's the issue. It's that the Bible talks a whole lot about the Holy Spirit. He is very important to the theology. If He can be trapped, it means the Bible got a lot of things wrong. Trlkly (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Uh, the Bible got everything wrong, it's fiction... -- The Cat Lady (talk) 09:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- No it didn't; Even if you don't believe it's the infallible word of God (it is), you still need to except it as a book with potentially unreliable historical accounts of things that actually happened
- Uh, the Bible got everything wrong, it's fiction... -- The Cat Lady (talk) 09:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Nk22 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Woah
Why is the 2nd frame inverted?