Editing Talk:865: Nanobots
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The current explanation suggests that Earth still has a chance/is not ''completely'' doomed yet. However, surely, disassembling 40% of the Earth's volume (even in the best case scenario of it eating less than 40% of the crust) would, ''surely'', still result in a full extinction of all life on Earth and turn the planet into a ball of lava? Could someone go What If on this question? [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 09:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | The current explanation suggests that Earth still has a chance/is not ''completely'' doomed yet. However, surely, disassembling 40% of the Earth's volume (even in the best case scenario of it eating less than 40% of the crust) would, ''surely'', still result in a full extinction of all life on Earth and turn the planet into a ball of lava? Could someone go What If on this question? [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 09:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Well, for a start, the ISS/whatever would probably be Ok, in its orbit. (Not counting the issues of resupply, though, if it's still not self-sufficient/part of a decent off-world economy/supply-chain. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.219|172.71.178.219]] 17:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | :Well, for a start, the ISS/whatever would probably be Ok, in its orbit. (Not counting the issues of resupply, though, if it's still not self-sufficient/part of a decent off-world economy/supply-chain. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.219|172.71.178.219]] 17:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
β |