Talk:749: Study

Perhaps the flyer itself IS the study? If many people picks the number then the result would be that people cannot distinguish the scams. ‎103.31.5.88 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

Doesn't work though. Because of the paradox involved. If it is actually a study, it doesn't prove anything if people pick it, because it is not a kidney harvesting scam. And if it is a kidney harvesting scam, it is not a study and thus the result doesn't matter (Except for the people who lack kidneys now)

Actually, it’s hinted at very strongly that it IS a kidney harvesting scam. 172.68.47.6 00:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I thought it was supposed to be both when I read this one. --108.162.215.58 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

I wonder how this would work. Maybe some people get a kidney harvesting scam and some get a sugar pill. 172.71.174.237 19:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm bothered by the description of paper as 'fibrous cellulose pulp'. To me that implies a liquid, whereas I'm fairly sure paper is a solid. 172.70.90.162 16:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

What part of that implies liquid? Fibrous: no. Cellulose: famously a fibre, if not compressed into a solid form. Pulp: squishy and damp, maybe, but often substantially more tangible and strainable than an actual full on liquid, even at its squishiest and dampest. 172.69.43.174