Editing 1885: Ensemble Model
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
− | + | {{incomplete|Requires descriptions of each entry. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | |
− | + | An {{w|ensemble forecasting|ensemble model}} is a combination of multiple, similar models to show a wider range of possible outcomes. The graphs on the left are tracks of predictions from multiple models. In this comic, Randall starts out describing actual changes that ensemble models show, but sinks into absurdity, describing strange alternate universes and scenarios that likely would not be necessary in an actual model. | |
− | The | + | The upper graph looks like one plotting global temperatures with time using different scenarios, like this one: https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/figure-spm-5.html |
+ | The bottom right graph is a typical hurricane path-prediction graphic. | ||
− | + | Not all of the outcomes are serious. They are explained below: | |
− | ;…rain is 0.5% more likely in some areas | + | ;…rain is 0.5% more likely in some areas |
− | + | Historical rain data are used to estimate the probability of rainstorms of a certain size and duration occurring, e.g. the {{w|Flood Studies Report|Flood Studies Report}} in the UK. [[Randall]] here is suggesting that an alternate universe exists where these estimates are higher (and presumably lower) in some areas, and that the estimates of rainfall in this alternate universe is accounted for within ensemble modelling in our own universe. This sort of change in prediction is frequently used when accounting for 'worst case scenarios' in the design processes of structures such as dams. However, the figures to the left appear to indicate time-dependent models, which are typically physics based, e.g. {{w|Large eddy simulation|Large Eddy Simulation}} models or other atmospheric process based models. In those sorts of models, likelihood of rain is usually a prediction rather than a parameter, but might be used as a parameter in a second iteration. | |
+ | |||
+ | ;…wind speeds are slightly lower | ||
+ | A usual parameter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;…pressure levels are randomly tweaked | ||
+ | A very vague but otherwise understandable parameter. | ||
;…dogs run slightly faster | ;…dogs run slightly faster | ||
− | This is where the comic diverges from reality; there is no reason to have the locomotion speed of dogs as a parameter | + | This is where the comic diverges from reality; there is no reason to have the locomotion speed of dogs as a parameter. |
− | |||
;…there is one extra cloud in the Bahamas | ;…there is one extra cloud in the Bahamas | ||
Line 29: | Line 35: | ||
;…snakes are wide instead of long | ;…snakes are wide instead of long | ||
− | |||
;…Will Smith took the lead in ''The Matrix'' instead of ''Wild Wild West'' | ;…Will Smith took the lead in ''The Matrix'' instead of ''Wild Wild West'' | ||
− | Actor {{w|Will Smith}} famously | + | Actor {{w|Will Smith}} famously turned down the lead role of {{w|Neo (The Matrix)|Neo}} in ''{{w|The Matrix}}'', instead taking the role of Captain James T. West in the widely-panned action-comedy ''{{w|Wild Wild West}}''. The role of Neo ultimately went to {{w|Keanu Reeves}}. For a more detailed discussion of how the cinematic world would have been different had Smith taken the role, see [https://moviepilot.com/posts/2481780 "How Will Smith Turned Down "The Matrix" - And Blew A Chance To Change Hollywood Forever."] |
− | |||
− | |||
;…swimming pools are carbonated | ;…swimming pools are carbonated | ||
− | A simple calculation reveals this as a serious {{w|Greenhouse effect|greenhouse}} problem. In the United States | + | A simple calculation reveals this as a serious {{w|Greenhouse effect|greenhouse}} problem. In the United States there are not less than 5,000,000 private owned pools. Conservatively assumed a volume of 25,000 liters per pool gives 125 billion liters of carbonated soda. According to Wikipedia the U.S. sales reached around 30 billion bottles of water in 2008 (including non carbonated water) which is surely much less than all the pool water. While all those bottles are not considered to have an impact on the green house effect this scenario is getting even worse. Open a bottle of carbonated water and fill the content into glasses. More or less soon the sprinkling is over, meaning you have to open the next bottle and so on. In a pool at the bottom the pressure is high enough to hold the carbon dioxide but on the surface it behaves like the glass. So, while a glass needs new carbonated water every two hours, or ten times per day, let's say it's three times per day for the pool which leads to one thousand times per year. The total number in this scenario would be 125 trillion liters of carbonated soda, ejecting carbon dioxide, per year. But stop: The carbon dioxide used for artificial carbonated water is taken from the air and because of the pressure at the bottom of the pool it doesn't release all back this should have a positive effect. But as Randall has shown in {{what if|88|Soda Sequestration}} this effect would be minimal. |
;…sliced bread, after being banned in January 1943, was never re-legalized. | ;…sliced bread, after being banned in January 1943, was never re-legalized. | ||
{{w|Sliced bread}} was in fact {{w|Sliced bread#1943 U.S. ban on sliced bread|banned in the US}} for about two months in early 1943, as a supposed wartime conservation measure. The issue was not the bread itself, but that the pre-sliced loaves required a heavier {{w|wax paper}} wrapping to prevent them from drying out too quickly. | {{w|Sliced bread}} was in fact {{w|Sliced bread#1943 U.S. ban on sliced bread|banned in the US}} for about two months in early 1943, as a supposed wartime conservation measure. The issue was not the bread itself, but that the pre-sliced loaves required a heavier {{w|wax paper}} wrapping to prevent them from drying out too quickly. | ||
− | The title text suggests that Randall has been pitching an absurd "alternate-universe crime drama" to {{w|Netflix}} | + | The title text suggests that [[Randall]] has been pitching an absurd "alternate-universe crime drama" to {{w|Netflix}}. He indicates that a breakdown in communication has occurred between them, though he does not assume directly assume responsibility for this situation. It is nonetheless clear that Netflix has zero interest in the pitch, and so Randall has become overzealous in pushing his idea, to the point that Netflix employees are changing their numbers (presumably they can't block his number because he has resorted to calling from many different phones). He has even taken to infiltrating Netflix's corporate headquarters using ill-gotten security codes, which is definitely illegal{{Citation needed}}, much like [[Elaine]]'s "meetings" with Steve Jobs in [[1337: Part 3]]. |
However, it is clear that Netflix is uninterested and is attempting to prevent Randall from contacting them (or trespassing into the building). | However, it is clear that Netflix is uninterested and is attempting to prevent Randall from contacting them (or trespassing into the building). | ||
Line 65: | Line 68: | ||
:…swimming pools are carbonated | :…swimming pools are carbonated | ||
:…sliced bread, after being banned in January 1943, was never re-legalized. | :…sliced bread, after being banned in January 1943, was never re-legalized. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Science]] |
− | |||
− |