Editing Talk:1163: Debugger

Isn't this also a reference to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem halting problem]? [[User:DonGoat|DonGoat]] ([[User talk:DonGoat|talk]]) 08:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

:It may be, but it isn't an INSTANCE of halting problem. You can understand how something work without being able to predict what exactly it will do. The problem may be also related to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems Gödel's incompleteness theorems], which basically states that any nontrivial theory cannot be proven consistent and complete in itself. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

It's also reminiscent of a joke: ''"I was saying to myself that a brain is truly a wondrous creation with its complexity and power. And then I realized '''who''' is saying that to me."'' -- [[User:Edheldil|Edheldil]] ([[User talk:Edheldil|talk]]) 10:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Not sure if it's relevant, but it reminds me of a quote: 'If our brains were simple enough for us to understand them, we'd be so simple that we couldn't' by Ian Stewart. (Yeah, I do know it from Civilization 4.) [[User:Lmpk|Lmpk]] ([[User talk:Lmpk|talk]]) 20:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

If the "Report a bug" page stopped working, and it was a site with some traffic, it's administrators ''could'' find out by noticing there were no more bug reports by users. The lack of bugs reported would point to a bug. Or a great deal of arrogance. -- [[User:Martin42|Martin42]] ([[User talk:Martin42|talk]]) 05:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

:You made a series of assumptions here in your attempt to overthrow the bug analogy - 1. The "Report a bug" page used to work at some point in time; 2. The site had traffic, meaning that the site had previously been online; 3. The users of the site had been consistently using the "Report a bug" page to report bugs (because, you know, I always just leave the site without caring enough to submit a bug report); 4. Someone actually reads the bug reports and does something about them.  Judging by how specific your example is, I don't believe you can successfully use that one instance to claim that the analogy does not accurately describe the situation in general. [[User:NiccoloM|NiccoloM]] ([[User talk:NiccoloM|NiccoloM]]) 00:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Also note the title "debugger." Most computer programmers don't understand how a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debugger debugger] works, but they rely on it to understand how their code works. -- [[User:Paul42|Paul42]] ([[User talk:Paul42|talk]]) 16:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Somehow related, an actual problem when people start losing their mental capabilities, typically due to age. Both my parents (age around 80) are starting to have important lapses of judgement, and because they evaluate their behavior with their mind, they refuse to accept any issues in their thought process. As I'm witnessing this, I wonder the same think as the character does: ''I don't understand how my mind works, I wonder if it's working alright, but I use my mind to evaluate it...'' [[Special:Contributions/87.238.84.65|87.238.84.65]] 14:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Guest, 1st time posting.

I think the comic is called "Debugger" because if there is a bug in debugger, how do you debug it if this debugger is the only debugger you've got? The answer is that there are other computers with their own debuggers walking around and they may, in principle, find a bug in your debugger. This is how science works actually.
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Somehow related, an actual problem when people start losing their mental capabilities, typically due to age. Both my parents (age around 80) are starting to have important lapses of judgement, and because they evaluate their behavior with their mind, they refuse to accept any issues in their thought process. As I'm witnessing this, I wonder the same think as the character does: ''I don't understand how my mind works, I wonder if it's working alright, but I use my mind to evaluate it...'' [[Special:Contributions/87.238.84.65|87.238.84.65]] 14:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Guest, 1st time posting.
-I think the comic is called "Debugger" because if there is a bug in debugger, how do you debug it if this debugger is the only debugger you've got? The answer is that there are other computers with their own debuggers walking around and they may, in principle, find a bug in your debugger. This is how science works actually. {{unsigned|76.16.124.121}}
+I think the comic is called "Debugger" because if there is a bug in debugger, how do you debug it if this debugger is the only debugger you've got? The answer is that there are other computers with their own debuggers walking around and they may, in principle, find a bug in your debugger. This is how science works actually.
-Here is the simple truth: '''"It's working!"''' (There is '''no wrong''' in nature. Everything is true. While a thing exists, it's perfectly fine and it shouldn't be any different. When a thing is not fine, it stops to exist/dies.) {{unsigned ip|162.158.83.240}}
-this reminds me that i once found more bugs than the debugger [[User:An user who has no account yet|An user who has no account yet]] ([[User talk:An user who has no account yet|talk]]) 18:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
-Whoops haha. And ''MAYBE'' we could use the simple but ever-so-complex workings of the brain to '''''take over the world.''''' (evil laugh) Nah, jk. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.175.126|162.158.175.126]] 18:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)