| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--> | | <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--> |
| − |
| |
| − | This is me when I don't want to fact-check things I only barely remember reading about once. -V [[Special:Contributions/172.70.206.163|172.70.206.163]] 09:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | That with knowing a normal amount about skyscrapers reminds me of typing with one's human hands in #1530 (Keyboard mash)--[[User:Gunterkoenigsmann|Gunterkoenigsmann]] ([[User talk:Gunterkoenigsmann|talk]]) 17:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | And once again, no love for ''Ostankino teletower'' built in 1966, which is a building-like structure unlike that bayonet-like CN Tower. *sighs in Muscovite* [[Special:Contributions/172.70.251.112|172.70.251.112]] 10:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The Ostankino tower isn't considered a building. It doesn't have "continuously occupiable floors", so it's a just a tower, same as the CN...except shorter. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.230.75|172.70.230.75]] 11:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | But a decade older - doesn't concern the nineties, though. [[User:627235|627235]] ([[User talk:627235|talk]]) 11:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Fun additional trivia! The Willis Tower has over 100 floors, with floor 103 or so having an observation area meant for tourists. There're these glass boxes that extend out the sides you can walk into, with only an inch-and-a-half of disconcertingly-clear material between you and certain death. Source: I've been there, though it has been years. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.126.215|172.70.126.215]] 11:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | While colloquially confused, there is a difference between "building" (a structure build for interior/floor space), a "tower" (a free-standing structure whose purpose is to provide height for some application at the top while using little or none of the height for actual floors or at least not seeing them as a priority) and a "mast" (a thin, often lattice work, structure supported by {{w|guy wires}}. Also several measurements of height (especially for buildings) like roof height, structural height, highest floor or pinnacle (total) height including antennas.
| |
| − | The highest buildings during the 90s were: Sears Tower (roof and structural), WTC North Tower (pinnacle/antenna and top floor), Petronas Towers (since 1998, only structural)
| |
| − | The highest other structures were the CN Tower (free-standing tower) and Warsaw Radio mast (collapsed 1991) succeeded by the KVLY mast, both cable supported.
| |
| − | In 2004, the Taipei 101 succeeded the Sears Tower as highest building (floor since 2001, roof) and the Petronas Towers (structural) but not pinnacle height (2000 the antenna was extended to "beat" the WTC, succeeded by Burj Khalifa) [[User:627235|627235]] ([[User talk:627235|talk]]) 11:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − | Sears Tower antenna/pinnacle height, that is, not Petronas. [[User:627235|627235]] ([[User talk:627235|talk]]) 11:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Say what you like about the Birj Khalifa, it does make this debate less troubling. It's the tallest... just about any definition you care to pick (building, structure, ego stroke, phallic compensation, etc.). [[Special:Contributions/172.71.22.167|172.71.22.167]] 21:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | What's with the dislike of "inhabitable"? Can I inhabit a particular floor? Maybe. Can I habit one? Not really. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.5|172.70.162.5]] 16:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
