Difference between revisions of "Talk:2943: Unsolved Chemistry Problems"
(comment) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
i've always been taught that the p stood for "parts". [[user talk:lettherebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 04:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC) | i've always been taught that the p stood for "parts". [[user talk:lettherebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 04:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :In chemistry, I was taught that it was "potential". I didn't even know this was in dispute. [[User:L-Space Traveler|L-Space Traveler]] ([[User talk:L-Space Traveler|talk]]) 04:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:54, 8 June 2024
P stands for poncentration, SMH my head π --172.70.162.211 21:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Is 'depolymerization' in this context referring to means of chemically recycling plastics? As I understand it, we basically just do recycling of thermoplastics at the moment by physically melting them, whereas being able to split a plastic apart into its component monomers would in principle enable a completely closed loop lifecycle for plastics, easing the strain on dwindling oil reserves and landfills and whatnot. Since these are supposed to be important unsolved problems, I feel like it probably is a reference to this, but I'm not a chemist and there may be something else which makes more sense. 162.158.33.134 22:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
i've always been taught that the p stood for "parts". youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk 04:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- In chemistry, I was taught that it was "potential". I didn't even know this was in dispute. L-Space Traveler (talk) 04:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
