Difference between revisions of "Talk:1220: Hipsters"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC) | :We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hipster stuff is not meta enough. How about gender-fucking-fucking ? | ||
+ | --[[Special:Contributions/37.160.11.143|37.160.11.143]] 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:49, 3 June 2013
The truth, at last! 62.235.181.153 11:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Someone let me know if there are any other graphs that make it worse, otherwise we're dealing with: 1 graph, (and thus approx.) 5 metacomplaints, 9 use/discussion complaints, 11 complaints and 12,5 hipsters. Unless of course, Randall's using one of his log scales or a completely different scale, and knowing him, it's not unlikely... Blue Charizard (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- There are many, many graphs, flowcharts, pie charts, etc, about hipsters on the internet. Just Google "hipster graphs"...so Randall must be talking about way more than only 12.5 hipsters... --Dangerkeith3000 (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --DanB (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hipster stuff is not meta enough. How about gender-fucking-fucking ? --37.160.11.143 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)