Difference between revisions of "Talk:676: Abstraction"
m |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 21:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 21:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
− | It's not the most minimal, but have you tried xubuntu? It's working for me so far. | + | :It's not the most minimal, but have you tried xubuntu? It's working for me so far. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.118|108.162.245.118]] 19:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC) |
− | [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.118|108.162.245.118]] 19:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC) | + | |
+ | When even Adobe stops supporting Flash in the next 3 years, this will need an incomplete tag put back to explain what Flash is. Hell some now may not know as is it not as heavily used as it was just a few years ago. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.166|108.162.216.166]] 11:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:23, 21 April 2021
Seriously what is the minimum Linux OS that I need for an oldish box (that has applications.) Most of the miniature OSs I have tried are ludicrously skank. I need it for a modernish office that can convert stuff to Word, for a publisher who has never heard of Linux.
I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's not the most minimal, but have you tried xubuntu? It's working for me so far. 108.162.245.118 19:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
When even Adobe stops supporting Flash in the next 3 years, this will need an incomplete tag put back to explain what Flash is. Hell some now may not know as is it not as heavily used as it was just a few years ago. 108.162.216.166 11:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)